From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interwiki conflict   Merge-arrows.svg
Items involved: Q25833Talk, Q993462Talk, Q15303756Talk, Q17092469Talk Status: X mark.svg   not resolved

hu:Eutheria clearly says that Eutheria!=Placentalia and points species which are in one but not in another. So may be it was a hurry to join with Q993462. Infovarius (talk) 11:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


Vidu: Q15303756 Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

@FelixReimann:, please comment on your merge. --Infovarius (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
@FelixReimann, Brya, Succu:, so what to do? --Infovarius (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Infovarius, it depends from the taxonomic viewpoint. I think Q15303756 and Eutheria (Q17092469) should connected to Placentalia (Q25833) via said to be the same as (P460). --Succu (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
I can not really tell, they don't look the same to me. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

No rank on taxon rank (P105)[edit]

Does it make sense to have no value for a taxon rank (P105)? See this edit where @Succu: reestablish it. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Why do you think so? --Succu (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Can we find a source that says that it cannot be given a taxonomic rank? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
It's not about „cannot be given a taxonomic rank”. The first usage of the name "Placentalia" by Richard Owen (Q151556) did not included a rank assignment. --Succu (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Not a synonym of Eutheria[edit]

Please do not add Eutheria as scientific name for this item, as Placentalia and Eutheria are not synonyms (the latter including the former plus a number of prehistoric forms closer to Placentalia than to other taxa).--Leptictidium (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)