User talk:Conny

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hello visitor, I'm very happy to answer questions and inquiries. Please discuss at the place discussion get started.

Welcome to Wikidata, Conny!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike, and you can help. Go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Regards, --Bene* (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ein herzliches Willkommen bei Wikidata :-) --Bene* (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön :) . --Conny (talk) 21:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Admin[edit]

Per your successful RfA I have promoted you to administrator. Congratulations. Best regards. — MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) . Conny (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Interwiki conflicts[edit]

Hello, Conny. You have new messages at Zolo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Younger/older version[edit]

Hi, there is currently no adopted policy for using lower numbers, and that serves no purpose except being aesthetically pleasing. If you want to undelete, move all of the links over and lose the history associated with the page with more links - go ahead. However, there is no need to according to policy as of yet. See Wikidata talk:Deletion policy for a proposal on it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So then ;) - the history get lost, if you use newer version. First ID ist ID to use for my oppinion. Conny (talk) 14:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Usually, the version with the most links has the history that is usable (though in this case, both only had bot contributions so it doesn't matter). If you feel it is worth doing, then I won't stop you... but I don't see the need myself. Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could be that you haven't seen my question on page Talk:Q1399895. Could you please reply there, thanks. --Stryn (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, answered there. Conny (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Admin confirmations[edit]

Hello! We are currently in the process of confirming all of the early admins, and you are scheduled to be confirmed between 7 - 11 February 2013. Please create an entry at Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/4, and see Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013 for more details. Techman224Talk 00:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. I know and did that allready :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 17:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Quellen[edit]

Hi Conny, bei Ben Nevis hast du für die Aussage "Geographisches Objekt" zwei Quellen angegeben:

  1. Verlag: Axel Springer AG
  2. Verlag: Scottish Mountaineering Club

Quellenangaben sind zwar fast immer gut, aber "Axel Springer AG" ist leider zu allgemein. Wo soll ich da nachschlagen? Autor, Buchtitel, Ausgabe, Seitenangabe: alles fehlt. Und der zweite Eintrag ist kein Verlag, sondern ein Club. Außerdem: Die Aussage, dass ein Berg ein "Geographisches Objekt" ist, ist weitgehend unstrittig. Belegt werden sollten weiterführende Angaben wie Höhe, Erstbesteigung etc. Fröhliches Schaffen --Kolja21 (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Die für Quellenangaben wichtige Eigenschaft (property) "Buchtitel" fehlt leider noch, kommt aber hoffentlich in den nächsten Tagen. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für deine Nachfrage. Ich habe erste Versuche unternommen, leider konnte ich die Inhalte, welche ich eintragen wollte nicht eintragen. Mit Buchtitel das ist mir auch aufgefallen :) . Aber Problem ist, nicht jeder Buchtitel einen Wikipediaartikel hat - im Moment scheinen dort nur Items als Quellen angebbar zu sein? Gibt es eine Beschreibungsseite für Sources - ich habe in kurzer Suche nichts gefunden. Grüße, Conny (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Bislang hieß es immer, dass wir Quellen noch nicht verwenden sollen. Ich denke daran hat sich mit dem Update von gestern nichts geändert. Eine Beschreibungsseite gibt es noch nicht. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für den Hinweis. Keine Ahnung wie nicht informierte Benutzer damit umgehen - mangels Diffanzeige fällt dies leider auch nicht offensichtlich auf... Conny (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Die Diffanzeige funktioniert jetzt für die Eigenschaften. Was die Quellen betrifft, habe ich einfach mal die Frage im Forum (Wikidata:Project chat#Sources) gepostet. Grüße --Kolja21 (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Entries[edit]

Hi! I made double entry for Boldino Fall, this one should be deleted: Q8438000. I apologize, I'm new at this. Cheers, Silbel (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's done, thank your for the advice. Conny (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Spezialseite[edit]

Moin, laut WD:N sollen Spezialseiten nicht mit Wikidata-Einträgen beglückt werden. Ich hab den Eintrag zur Beobachtungsliste daher gelöscht. Gruß, IW 17:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. War begeistert, dass es funktioniert hat :) . Grüße, Conny (talk) 17:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Mass deletions[edit]

Hi, next time when you will delete many items within a short time, please enable the flood flag. Thanks. --Stryn (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip. Conny (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Re: bottask musicbrainz[edit]

Hello, Conny. You have new messages at Ricordisamoa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 17:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

R stable version[edit]

Hi, Conny

I deleted the "Imported from: English Wikipedia" source because it referred to the 3.0.0 version, not the 3.0.1. What I did was: noticed it needed to be updated; checked latest version at R official site; updated latest stable version at Wikidata; then removed the source.

Was this correct? I've read some of the Wikidata documentation, but not all of it. I may be doing things not in the appropriate way. How should it be done?

Cheers, Moretti (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I understand :) . Thank you. In my information there is at this time no way to give a url as source. I have to think about that. Greetings, Conny (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The property P596 (P596) that you supported is available now. --Tobias1984 (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Please undelete and restore all links. http://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWagino_20100516&diff=41437516&oldid=41118108. Infovarius (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explain or undelete please. --Infovarius (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems done, greetings, Conny (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]
What is done? Q3181348 is different rank, they should be separated. Infovarius (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Undeleted now. Contact me if you have queries over it Conny. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorie:Leuchtdiode[edit]

Hi Conny, bitte in Q5901963 die Kategorie:Leuchtdiode von de.wp einzufügen, danke.--Wdwd (talk) 20:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Conny (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Diese Änderungen waren natürlich Unsinn. Sie stammen von Sheynhertz-Unbayg. Am besten zurücksetzen oder die Items, falls möglich, gleich verbessern. Holger1959 (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir. Conny (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

de:Bürstenloser Motor[edit]

Hi Conny, hab wieder einen: bitte in Q521013 den de.wp Artikel de:Bürstenloser Motor hinzuzufügen, danke.--Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. Grüße, Conny (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Just created Elo rating (P1087). --Tobias1984 (talk) 07:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip :) . Greetings, Conny (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Mahlzeit,

könntest du die beiden bitte zusammenlegen? Ich hab keine Ahnung wie das geht und möchte mich da gerade auch nicht einlesen ;) Grüße--MaxEddi (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. Grüße, Conny (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Projekt Oberlausitz[edit]

Ich bin grad über die Anfrage zum Projekt Oberlausitz gestolpert. Nun bin ich hier selbst immer noch am Entdecken, aber vielleicht hilft diese Task Force Wikidata:Cultural heritage task force und der User:Multichill weiter. -- Pütz M. (talk) 01:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DAnke für den Hinweis :) . Conny (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

FideID[edit]

Hello, You participiated in the discussion of the property Elo rating (P1087), so you might be interested to know that there now is a proposal for a property of a related topic: FideID. It is discussed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person#FideID. Regards, Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 04:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hast du dazu eine Antwort? --Kolossos (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Habs mal aus dem Archiv gesucht. Nach meinem Verständnis braucht man entweder einen neuen Wikipedia Artikel, um die Unterscheidung zu machen, oder man fügt als Qualifier eine Zusatzinformation mit dran. Tendiere aber eher zum ersten Punkt. Würde das was bringen? Soll ich mir das mal konkreter anschauen? Grüße, Conny (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Viking funerals[edit]

Please see Talk:Q2662083. --80.71.135.52 10:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

another dupe[edit]

Hallo Conny, Q18508484 (mit Link auf commons) ist identisch mit Q5306359 (mit Wp-Links). Geburtsdatum 5. März scheint richtig zu sein. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Dankende, Conny (talk) 16:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Hallo. Könntest du als Admin der deutschen Version dieses Artikels bitte ein "featured list" spendieren? Danke. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Dabei frag ich mich, wieso die Möglichkeit gegeben wird, dies als normaler Nutzer selbst zu tun, wenn es dann doch grundsätzlich nicht speicherfähig ist.[reply]

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis :) . Informative Liste vergeben. Habe mal getestet - Die Begründung bei dem Versuch als Benutzer zu speichern lautet, dass dies Konsensentscheidungen in den jeweiligen Wikipedien sind und somit nur durch Administratoren gemacht werden sollten :( . Grüße, Conny (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Vielen Dank auch Dir! :) Auf Wikidata (nicht so meine Nische) scheint es wohl, noch Baustellen zu geben. ;) --SamWinchester000 (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Auf jeden Fall. Fühl dich frei mich zu kontaktieren :D . Grüße, Conny (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Kannst Du bitte unter Talk:Q274758 die Situation erklären? --Fomafix (talk) 13:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Item to be delete[edit]

In RFD there are one or more item proposed for the deletion created by you. If you do not agree you can participate in the debate --ValterVB (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Conny (talk) 08:51, 4 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Noobfrage[edit]

Hallo Conny - wie geht das nach dem Beantragen eines neuen Property weiter? - Da steht jetzt oben "ready". Kommt irgendwann jemand vorbei und erstellt das Property oder muss ich dafür noch irgendwas anstellen? (Wikidata lässt mich immer wieder mit einem ratlosen Gesicht zurück....) --Ordercrazy (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schau ich mir zeitnah an. Danke für Hinweis, Conny (talk) 09:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

I don't know why? Is there any reason that that can't simply replaced by the new created Quora username (P4411) value? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Liuxinyu970226, redone it :D . Conny (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

stop vandalising[edit]

right now 78.55.25.245 12:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What edit do you mean? Regards, Conny (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Block of German IP range[edit]

15:16, 10 May 2018 Mahir256 (talk | contribs) blocked 77.179.0.0/16 (talk) with an expiration time of 3 months (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (This IP range has been abused by a vandal for a long time, please log in to edit)

Why that? 77.180.100.59 15:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask user:Mahir256 for details. Regards, Conny (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]
You've already spoken to MisterSynergy about it. Mahir256 (talk) 05:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #3[edit]

Welcome to the third newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

Two Growth team projects to be deployed in next two weeks

We will be deploying the "Understanding first day" and "Personalized first day" projects on Czech and Korean Wikipedias in the coming weeks. See the new project pages below for full details on the projects, and our project updates page for their progress.

  • Understanding first day: learn about the actions new editors take right after creating their accounts. We will be careful with user privacy, and we hope to share initial results in December.
  • Personalized first day: learn about new editors' objectives by adding some optional questions to the new editor’s registration process, and personalizing their onboarding. We hope to share initial results in December.

Third Growth team project begins

  • Focus on help desk: direct newcomers to the local help desks where they can ask questions to help them make their first edits. We hope to have an initial experiment running in December.

Best practices for helping newcomers

We are going to direct newcomers to help desks. But what's the best way to reply to a newcomer there? We have gathered some best practices for successful interactions, based on community experiences and some external documentation. The page has also been reviewed by some experienced community members who suggested some changes. That page is now open for translations. Comments and suggestions are still welcome!

We are still looking for volunteers

Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.

Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project page for detailed updates on the projects we'll work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 13:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.[reply]

Growth team updates #4[edit]

Welcome to the fourth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

We need your feedback!

We have two requests for community members:

  1. Now that data is coming in for the welcome survey, we are planning how to use that data to personalize the newcomer's first day. See our current thoughts here, and join the conversation here.
  2. Try out the help panel's interactive prototype, and read about how we're planning to roll it out, and post any thoughts or reactions here.

Two Growth team projects have been deployed (detailed updates here)

  • Personalized first day (welcome survey) was deployed on November 20 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
    • The survey is now being shown to half of new users (A/B test). Responses are being recorded in the database. We'll report on initial results during December.
    • We are planning to test a second version of the survey, called "Variation C", which we think will maximize the number of users who complete the survey and stay on the wiki.
    • The original objective of this project was to give newcomers the materials they need to achieve their goals, and so now we are currently planning how we will use the information collected in the welcome survey to personalize the newcomer's experience. We hope community members will read our current thinking and join the conversation here. Some of the plans we are considering include:
      • Making it easy for newcomers to see editing activity around the topic areas in which they indicated that they're interested.
      • Connecting interested newcomers to experienced editors.
      • Surfacing the help content most relevant to the reason for which the newcomers created their accounts.
  • Understanding first day (EditorJourney) was deployed on November 15 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias. It has been done after a longer security review and final testing than expected. Data is now being recorded for all new users on those wikis, and we've been auditing the data and preparing to make initial reports during December. Stay tuned for the next newsletter!

Help panel is under construction

  • Focus on help desk (help panel) is planned to be deployed during the week of January 7 on both Czech and Korean Wikipedias.
  • This interactive prototype is the best way to see the design and wording in the feature.
  • We ran live user tests on the prototype, with results posted here.
  • In addition to giving the ability to ask a question, the help panel will also contain a set of links to existing help content. Our ambassadors on Czech and Korean Wikipedias are determining the right initial set of most helpful links in this task.
  • We encourage community members to try out the prototype and read about the rules for who will get the feature, and add any thoughts to this discussion.

We are still looking for volunteers

Do you want to participate to our experiments? We are looking for new communities to work with us (especially a new mid-size wiki), and people to become ambassadors to help us to communicate with the different communities. Discover how you can involve yourself or your community.

Also, please share this update with your community and interested people!

Learn more about us

You can visit our team page to find out why our team was formed and how we are thinking about new editors, and our project updates page for detailed updates on the projects we work on.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 09:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Growth team updates #5[edit]

Welcome to the fifth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

New projects for discussion[edit]

We began the "Personalized first day" project with the welcome survey so that we could gather information about what newcomers are trying to accomplish. The next step is to use that information to create experiences that help the newcomers accomplish their goal – actually personalizing their first day. We asked for community thoughts in the previous newsletter, and after discussing with community members and amongst our team, we are now planning two projects as next steps: "engagement emails" and "newcomer homepage".

  • Engagement emails: this project was first discussed positively by community members here back in September 2018, and the team how has bandwidth to pursue it. The idea is that newcomers who leave the wiki don't get encouraged to return to the wiki and edit. We can engage them through emails that send them the specific information they need to be successful – such as contact from a mentor, the impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?
  • Newcomer homepage: we developed the idea for this project after analyzing the data from the welcome survey and EditorJourney datasets. We saw that many newcomers seem to be looking for a place to get started – a place that collects their past work, options for future work, and ways to learn more. We can build this place, and it can connect to the engagement emails. The content of both could be guided by what newcomers say they need during their welcome survey, and contain things like contact from a mentor, impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?

Initial reports on newcomer activity[edit]

We have published initial reports on each of the team's first two projects. These reports give the basic numbers from each project, and there are many more questions we will continue to answer in future reports. We're excited about these initial findings. They have already helped us define and design parts of our future projects.

  • Welcome survey: the initial report on welcome survey responses is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Most users respond to the survey, giving it high response rates of 67% and 62% in Czech and Korean Wikipedias, respectively.
    • The survey does not cause newcomers to be less likely to edit.
    • The most common reason for creating an account in Korean Wikipedia is to read articles—not for editing—with 29% of Korean users giving that responses.
    • Large numbers of respondents said they are interested in being contacted to get help with editing: 36% in Czech and 53% in Korean.
  • Understanding first day: the initial report on what newcomers do on their first day is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Large numbers of users view help or policy pages on their first day: 42% in Czech and 28% in Korean.
    • Large numbers of users view their own User or User Talk page on their first day: 34% in Czech and 39% in Korean.
    • A majority of new users open an editor on their first day – but about a quarter of them do not go on to save an edit during that time.

Help panel deployment[edit]

The help panel was deployed in Czech and Korean Wikipedias on January 10. Over the past four weeks:

  • About 400 newcomers in each wiki have seen the help panel button.
  • About 20% of them open up the help panel.
  • About 50% of those who open it up click on one of the links.
  • About 5% of Czech users ask questions, and about 1% of Korean users ask questions.

We think that the 20% open rate and 50% click rate are strong numbers, showing that a lot of people are looking for help, and many want to help themselves by looking at help pages. The somewhat lower numbers of asking questions (especially in Korean Wikipedia) has caused us to consider new features to allow people to help themselves. We're going to be adding a search bar to the help panel next, which will allow users to type a search that only looks for pages in the Help and Wikipedia namespaces.

How to create a good feedback page?[edit]

What is the way to built a good help page? What blocks you when writing an help page? Your replies will help to create better help contents to newcomers, that would be used on Help panel.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Dresden[edit]

Hallo Conny, ich hab mich mal etwas genauer mit SPARQL befasst und angefangen ein paar nützliche Abfragen für Dresden zu schreiben. Falls du Ideen hast, lass es mich wissen. -- sk (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Man spitze was du da alles gezaubert hast :) . Danke für Hinweis! Grüße, Conny (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Stefan Kühn: das finde ich auch stark. Grüße, Conny (talk) 08:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Io pan[edit]

Hello! Can you block this user? He changes correct links to uncorrect in Ukrainian Wikipedia. Thanks!--DiMon2711 10:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimon2711: Please talk to the user at first. Regards, Conny (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]
This is my message to him--DiMon2711 17:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also 2 times said it him in Ukrainian Wikipedia, but no reaction. Sorry, my English not very well--DiMon2711 17:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also applied to rollbacker rights. Can you give me its? Thanks!--DiMon2711 17:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Find Wikidata:Rollbackers. Conny (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Ah, you found :D . Conny (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Growth team updates #6[edit]

18:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Verschwundenes/Vermißte Objekte[edit]

Hallo Conny,
oft stoße ich beim Abarbeiten der Listen von Objekten, bzw. Denkmallisten auf Objekte die abgerissen, zerstört oder verschwunden, also nicht mehr an diesem Ort vorhanden sind. Wie gehen wir auf Wikidata damit um?Lutz (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Lutzto: Ich handhabe es über die Eigenschaft end time (P582), da man ja beispielsweise auch historische Karten erstellen möchte. Um aktuelle Denkmale zu finden, kann man dann filtern, dass nur Objekte ohne Endzeitpunkt angezeigt werden sollen. Auch die Qualifikatoren dazu sind interessant. Wenn der genaue Endzeitpunkt nicht bekannt ist, kann man bei den kleinen Kästchen neben der Eingabebox für das Datum "Unbekannter Wert" eingeben. Somit ist das Ende definitiv, aber nicht bekannt. Was sagst du dazu? Grüße dir, Conny (talk) 08:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Als Zwischenlösung sicher zu gebrauchen, aber oft weiß man nicht was damit geschehen ist, Beispiel Bernsteinzimmer, oder alte Gemälde die jetzt irgenwo im Keller eines Auftraggebers hängen. Irgendwie fehlt die Aussage ist Verschollen bei Objekten.Lutz (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Es gibt für Personen date of disappearance (P746) - dort habe ich zum Verfahren für Kunstwerke gefragt. Grüße dir, Conny (talk) 10:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Danke, ich kann nur schlechtes Deutsch ;-) Lutz (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Growth team updates #7[edit]

16:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019[edit]

Welcome to a special newsletter from the Growth team! This special newsletter is not about Wikimedia Foundation Growth team projects. Instead, it is a call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019. We think that many people who receive this newsletter may have something valuable to contribute to this space at Wikimania. We haven't translated the newsletter, because Wikimania's language is English.

Please see below for the message from the organizers of the Community Growth space at Wikimania.

---

Wikimania 2019 is organized into 19 “spaces”, which are all accepting proposals for sessions. This message comes from the team organizing the Community Growth space.

Since you are interested b Growth team projects, and potentially involved in welcoming newcomers initiatives on your wiki, we would like to invite you to submit a proposal to the Community Growth space because of the actions you’ve done around newcomers on wikis. The deadline for submission is June 1. See below for Community Growth submission topics and session formats. Topics and sessions have to be in English.

In the Community Growth space, we will come together for discussions, presentations, and workshops that address these questions:

  • What is and is not working around attracting and retaining newcomers?
  • How should Wikimedia activities evolve to help communities grow and flourish?
  • How should our technology and culture evolve to help new populations to come online, participate and become community members?

Recommended topics: please see this link for the list for the list of recommended topics. If you do not plan to submit a proposal, you can also suggest additional topics here. If your topic does not fit into our space, remember that there are 18 other spaces that could welcome you sharing your knowledge and perspective.

Types of session. We prefer sessions that are participatory, interactive, promote conversations, and give a voice to parts of our movement that are heard less often. Please see this link for the list of recommended session formats.

Poster submissions. Posters are also a good way to introduce a topic, or show some results of an action. Please consider submitting one!

More information about the Community Growth space, topics, and submission formats is available on the proposal page.

Please submit your proposal. The reviews will happen at the beginning of June.

If you have questions about Wikimania in general, please ask them on the Wikimania wiki.

On behalf of the Community Growth leadership team, Trizek (WMF), 11:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #8[edit]

09:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Friendly friendly[edit]

Hallo Conny, dieser User hat bisher mehr Edits bei Wikidata als du gemacht. Was glaubst du, wie lange braucht er noch um zu lernen, wie Wikidata fünktioniert? Er löscht Informationen, weil eine Vorlage in der nowiki nicht funktioniert. Das ist aber kein Problem von Wikidata, das müssen die selber lösen, aber nicht in dem die anfangen hier Zeugs rauszulöschen. Grüße -- MovieFex (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das hat nichts mit der norwegischen Ausgabe zu tun. Es dreht sich ganz einfach darum, dass »sourced from« keine Reference ist. Weil die Vorlage Wikidata (die meines Wissens international in allen Wikipedia-Ausgaben vorhanden ist, siehe z.B. »reference« in der englischen Wikipedia-Ausgabe erwartet, dass ein Beleg ein reeller Weblink ist, wird alles Andere Fehlmeldungen auslösen – und das natürlich nicht nur in der norwegischen Wikipedia. Weil Wikidata hauptsächlich existiert um die verschiedenen Wikipedia-Versionen zu bedienen und nicht hauptsächlich ein Ziel an sich ist, müssen die Einzelposten dem »Kunden«, also Wikipedia, angepasst werden. Asav (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ist es nicht sinnvoll, einen Wert ohne URL einfach in der Box auszublenden? Solange bis eine Referenz nachgetragen ist. Denkt sich Conny (talk) 20:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Asav, da liegst du ganz falsch: Wikidata ist nicht dazu da, um andere Wikipedia-Ausgaben zu bedienen. Andere Wikipedia-Ausgaben können sich aus Wikidata bedienen, das ist ein großer Unterschied. Wikidata ist ein eigenständiges Projekt, wie die norwegische Wikipedia auch. Offenbar ist in der Vorlage noch ein Bug drin, dann muss das eben gefixt werden. Wenn ihr diese Vorlage einsetzt geht das auf euer eigenes Risiko. Aber Wikidata zu manipulieren, dass das bei irgend jemand speziell funktioniert geht so nicht. Stell dir mal vor das machen andere auch noch. -- MovieFex (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #9[edit]

14:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #10[edit]

18:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #11[edit]

15:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Conny, this does not seem to be a umgebinde house. See map. Jedudedek (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem mit Merging[edit]

Hallo Conny, ich bitte um Hilfe bei dem Merging von Q43130920 in das Q1863550.

Beide Dateien betreffen die gleiche Person. Alle meine Versuche, die Dateien zusammenzumergen sind schiefgegangen.

Gruss - Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 20:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Szczebrzeszynski: Scheint geklappt zu haben :) . Grüße, Conny (talk) 08:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Conny: Schönsten Dank!--Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Postkarten Property[edit]

Morgen Conny, kannst du dir mal mein Wikidata:Property_proposal/Commons#Commons_Kategorie_für_Postkarten auf Richtigkeit anschauen. Danke. -- sk (talk) 05:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #12[edit]

17:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Problem mit Wikidata-Infobox auf Commons[edit]

Hallo Conny,

ich habe angefangen, die Wikidata-Datenbankeinträge zu den Kulturdenkmalen in Großschönau zu vervollständigen und die teilweise noch fehlenden Commons-Kategorien zu erfassen. Leider ist mir bei der Hauptstraße 81 ein Fehler unterlaufen, ich hatte nicht richtig geschaut und versehentlich die Hauptstraße 81 in Waltersdorf (Ortsteil von Großschönau) statt der gleichen Adresse in Großschönau erwischt. Ich habe die falschen Eingaben wieder gelöscht, allerdings wird in der Wikidata-Infobox auf Commons in der dazugehörigen Kategorie nun das falsche Wikidata-Objekt angezeigt. Kannst Du mir bitte helfen, die Infobox zu korrigieren bzw. weißt Du eine Lösung dafür? Danke und viele Grüße, RoesslerP (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo RoesslerP,
du bist sehr fleißig, das ist wunderbar :) . Die Boxen auf Commons unterliegen einer Verzögerung möglicherweise. Bei mir ist es korrekt. Du kannst einmal auf der Commons Seite versuchen, SHIFT auf der Tastatur zu halten und dann auf dem Browser oben auf "Diese Seite neu laden" zu klicken - dann werden alte Daten aus deinem Browser überschrieben. Siehe dazu auch en:Wikipedia:Bypass_your_cache. Ich Grüße dich und auf gute Zusammenarbeit, Conny (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Hallo Conny, danke für das Lob und den Tipp. Viele Grüße, RoesslerP (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that "perception" is included as an instance of "core concept," but this seems counterintuitive. What is the purpose of this classification? Jarble (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Query Karte der Umgebindehäuser[edit]

Umgebinde in Kopec

Hi Conny

There are 13 umgebinde houses on this map section. But the sum of the red dots and the values in the green circles is 27. The value in the green circle corresponds to the number of images for the WD item. Is not it a mistake? Jedudedek (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jedudedek: The query has to be optimized with a filter for that. In the past this query showed two points, if there has been twi streets in f. e. czech and german name (two contents). I think we can (should ;) ), fix our query also for pictures. I will check this soon... Regards, nice to meet you, Conny (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]
@Jedudedek: Use filtered map, so only one house is on map, if there are many pictures. The syntax is wrong, but it works :) . Regards, Conny (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for treatment. I planned some photography, but it will have to wait. I will try to add WD items to already photographed objects in my free time. Jedudedek (talk) 16:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conny,
"dvoulůžkový pokoj" is room with two beds ;-)
We'll have to take a good look at the terminology sometimes. I suppose this is a variant of a three-part house.[1] So far I have called it descriptively. Jedudedek (talk) 08:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #13[edit]

14:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Q96474728 - Fachwerkscheune?[edit]

Hallo Conny, kannst du hier noch was retten oder das Objekt löschen?

Ich wollte Fachwerkscheune erstellen, wofür es WP-Artikel fehlt, die Commons-Kategorie gibt es aber ... --WikiAnika (talk) 18:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter 14[edit]

09:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Inactivity[edit]

Hello. Unfortunately your administrator permissions have been removed because you did not make the required 5 actions in the last 6 months. Thanks for your service! --Rschen7754 18:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Conny (talk) 23:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

6000![edit]

Hi Conny!
So yesterday we exceeded the limit of 6000 items of umgebindehouse! We exceeded the limit of 5000 items at the end of August. 1000 items in two months! Now just keep up the pace ;-) Jedudědek (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your are so great man. I moved my house, so I searched my time ;) . The work of the last 7 years shows results now. Thank you very very much, your work is so impressive @Jedudedek, RoesslerP, Cieslak Jürgen, Karl_Gruber: Have a nice time, lets finish this ;) . Regards from Bautzen, Conny (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Jsi tak skvělý muž. Přesunul jsem svůj dům, takže jsem hledal svůj čas;). Práce posledních 7 let nyní ukazují výsledky. Velice vám děkuji, vaše práce je tak působivá. Příjemně se bavte, dokončete to;). S pozdravem Budyšín, Conny (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Ihr seid wunderbar. Ich bin umgezogen, also habe ich meine Zeit gesucht;). Die Arbeit der letzten 7 Jahre zeigt jetzt Ergebnisse. Vielen Dank, eure Arbeit ist so beeindruckend. Viel Spaß, lasst uns das beenden;). Grüße aus Bautzen, Conny (talk) 06:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Growth team updates #15[edit]

10:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Growth team updates #16[edit]

14:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Conny,
I don't see a umgebinde in these two houses. Are these houses where it was used and later removed?
Jedudědek (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jedudedek, Cieslak Jürgen: Diese Häuser waren gemäß Jürgen Cieslak einmal Umgebindehäuser. Man kann es an Teilen der Konstruktion erkennen. Ich ergänze den end time (P582). Beste Grüße, Conny (talk) 06:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
@Jedudedek, Cieslak Jürgen: According to Jürgen Cieslak, these houses were once Upper Lusatian houses. You can see it in parts of the construction. I add end time (P582). Best regards, Conny (talk) 06:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Growth team newsletter #17[edit]

16:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Growth Newsletter #18[edit]

15:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Upper Lusatian house (Q1362233)[edit]

Hi Conny, habe da mal was vorbereitet bezüglich der Abfrage von LfDS-Kulturdenkmalen: Suche in der Beschreibung nach Umgebinde und noch nicht als Upper Lusatian house festgelegt: https://w.wiki/3Xgj würde gerne zum Projekt mal eine on focus list of Wikimedia project (Property:P5008) erstellen - was hälst Du davon ? ciao matthias --Erfurth (talk) 12:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Liste, das ist sehr schön :) . Klar, erstelle gern was du magst! Beste Grüße, Conny (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
@Erfurth: Bin gespannt auf Fokusliste. :) Conny (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Ok, mir schwebt sowas wie Wikidata:WikiProject Lighthouses vor - ein Projekt für "wooden houses" (Q279118) in general ... Ich sammle mal noch bissel, bevor ich focus list und wd-project erstelle. Erste Vorstellung dann gerne zum nächsten Stammtisch. Ciao --Erfurth (talk) 07:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gute Idee. Conny (talk) 10:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata-Abfrage Umgebindehäuser[edit]

Hallo Conny,

vielen Dank für das Hinzufügen der Wikidata-Abfrage (Objekte mit "Umgebinde" in der Bezeichnung, die nicht als "Umgebindehaus" klassifiziert sind) auf der Diskussionsseite zu den Umgebindehäusern. Mir kam aber die Liste im Suchergebnis etwas kurz vor, nur 88 Ergebnisse. Auch wenn ich kaum Programmierkenntnisse für die Abfragen habe, habe ich mal etwas am Quelltext rumgebastelt. Ich habe die bisherige Abfrage so verstanden, dass nur Objekte mit Bildern gefunden werden. Meine angepasste Abfrage (keine Ahnung, ob das so richtig ist) verlinke ich mal hier. Da gibt es offenbar doch noch etwas mehr zu tun ...

Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende. RoesslerP (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Genau, ich hatte erstmal die Abfrage mit "zwingenden Bildern" (denn für mich immer zur Einordnung wichtig, wie das Haus wirklich aussieht) und dem Vorhandensein der LfDS-ID erstellt (könnte man auch noch weglassen). Ciao --Erfurth (talk) 20:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RoesslerP: Vielen Dank :) - habe es eingefügt. Beste Grüße, Conny (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Umgebinde[edit]

Hallo Conny,

Du interessierst Dich doch für die Umgebindehäuser. Ich trage gerade die Kulturdenkmal von Penig ein, dabei ist mr das untergekommen: Untere Hauptstraße 22; 22a (Q107427390). Kennst Du das schon bzw. ist das ein "echtes" Umgebindehaus? --Michael w (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey :) ,
ich baue noch an der Abfrage für den Osten von Sachsen. Ja, wir nehmen als Grundlage das Landesamt und dieses weist das Gebäude als Umgebinde (08955393) aus. Danke und Grüße, Conny (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Growth Newsletter #19[edit]

18:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Growth Newsletter #20[edit]

17:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #21[edit]

13:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #22[edit]

17:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #23[edit]

20:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #24[edit]

14:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #25[edit]

13:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #26[edit]

15:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #27[edit]

12:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #28[edit]

Trizek_(WMF) Discussion 23:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #29[edit]

18:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Growth News, April 2024[edit]

18:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)