Wikidata:Property proposal/skiresort.info ID
Skiresort.info ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Description | Record on skiresort.info for any specific ski resort (Q130003) |
|---|---|
| Represents | ski resort (Q130003) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | items |
| Allowed values | [\w-]+ |
| Example 1 | Perisher Ski Resort (Q1629394) → perisher |
| Example 2 | Alpe d'Huez (Q214364) → alpe-dhuez |
| Example 3 | Palisades Tahoe (Q2182804) → squaw-valley |
| Source | List: https://www.skiresort.info/ski-resorts/ |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Import via a Mix-n-Match catalogue |
| Number of IDs in source | According to the "all resorts" list page, there are 5550 items.[1] |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.skiresort.info/ski-resort/$1 |
| See also | Wikidata property related to winter sports (Q28600002) |
Motivation[edit]
Currently there are 20 Wikidata property related to winter sports (Q28600002), however all are Person IDs. As far as I can see (and I might be wrong!) there isn't currently any external authority control for Skiing/snowboarding "resorts" - the organisations that operate the ski-lifts and groom the slopes etc.
It seems that in Wikipedias (and consequently in Wikidata) there is sometimes a confusing between the "resort" and either the "town" or "mountain" of the same name. For example there is Zermatt (Q27494) (an instance of -> municipality of Switzerland (Q70208)) but nothing that corresponds to "Ski resort Zermatt/Breuil-Cervinia/Valtournenche – Matterhorn" (the area that your lift-ticket will you allow you to ski in).
Equally we have Tignes (Q330899) which is currently classified as BOTH an instance of -> commune of France (Q484170) and ski resort (Q130003), yet all the authority controls for that item refer to it as an "administrative unit"/"local authority" etc. I believe in that case, the item should be split between the town (which should have properties like "population") and the ski-resort (which could have things like "number of ski lifts" or "base/summit elevation"... This new ID might help to disambiguate such cases. (For comparison, I note we have Mount Perisher (Q21941924) (mountain), Perisher Ski Resort (Q1629394) (resort), and Perisher Valley (Q2071157) (town).]
Finally, I'd appreciate if someone could double-check I've filled in the proposal template accurately, and the regex. I'm new at it :-) Wittylama (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support David (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Question: Should this be "skiresort.info ID" or merely "skiresort ID"? Wittylama (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Wittylama: 
Done: Skiresort.info ID (P6389) − Pintoch (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)