Wikidata:Property proposal/adjacent to
adjacent to[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place
| Description | item located adjacent to this item (sharing at least one point of contact between them or being otherwise located in a relative adjacent location) |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Example 1 | Bradley Air National Guard Base (Q3813390) → Bradley International Airport (Q1420233) |
| Example 2 | Mona Lisa (Q12418) -> Jupiter Hurling Thunderbolts at the Vices (Q18573249) |
| Example 3 | Interstate 5 (Q54725) -> Oregon Route 99 (Q2494323) |
| Example 4 | Strawberry Mountain (Q7622461) -> Lookout Mountain (Q39074796) |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| See also | adjacent station (P197), shares border with (P47), adjacent building (P3032), located in or next to body of water (P206) |
Motivation[edit]
We already have a few specific properties for adjacency, but instead of creating a new property for every different type of item that adjacency applies to, this would be a general property for all types for which there is not already a more specific one in existence (see the three related, specific properties linked above). Exact context of adjacency would depend on the exact type of item it is applied to, so no need for elaborate constraints on this property. It would become the parent property for the three properties already extant. Josh Baumgartner (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Comment I think we already had similar proposals, e.g. Wikidata:Property proposal/monument in the near. --- Jura 12:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing that one up. Adjacency cannot be calculated by coordinates and indicates a particular relationship between two entities, so while I understand the discussion there, it is not particularly relevant to this one. Josh Baumgartner (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- One of your samples is Mona Lisa (Q12418) -> Jupiter Hurling Thunderbolts at the Vices (Q18573249). I might be mistaken, but it seems that File:Musée du Louvre - Salle de la Joconde.jpg shows both (center right and center left). Unless it's outdated, it's not really clear how your proposal is different from "in the near": there are 10 paintings between them. --- Jura 12:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- If items have a physical contact point connects with (P2789) is our property that specifies that relationship. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that one out, it would probably do nicely for example 1. Not so sure it would work for 2, 3 & 4. Josh Baumgartner (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Can you explain why you think this example works better for those examples (I'm not familiar with those examples)? What's the shared point in contact? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that one out, it would probably do nicely for example 1. Not so sure it would work for 2, 3 & 4. Josh Baumgartner (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Not done Clear evidence of redundancy, not responded to by proposer. JesseW (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)