Wikidata:Property proposal/River Code

Code of Taiwan River[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place

Done: Taiwan River Code (P9170) (Talk and documentation)

Description	official code for the administrative divisions in Taiwan, and managed by the Water Resources Agency, MOEA.
Represents	Taiwan River Code (Q104093023)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	administrative divisions under Taiwan (Q865)
Allowed values	0-9, A-Z, 6 words,
Example	26條中央管河川 Huang Creek (Q16929154) → 101000 Dabao Xi (Q10938056) → 11401B Lanyang River (Q708461) → 256000
Source	水利署資料平台政府開放資料平台 110年台灣地區河川代碼(含維基數據)
Planned use	Provide Taiwan River Standard Identification Code

Motivation

水利署河川代碼能提供台灣水系資料標準識別碼，是台灣水文資料識別碼的基礎。 Allenwang6212a (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Notified participants of WikiProject Taiwan

Support For the organization work of Taiwan river, I will support this proposal.Supaplex (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems promising to current River Code defined by Taiwan Water Resource Agency(WRA).Phamhsieh(talk) 03:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -by 全速前進～～Yosoro！！～～的Tsuna Lu（留言） 10:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 00:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support NMaia (talk) 04:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support →→ 某幻 (留言給我) 07:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Allenwang6212a, NMaia: Wait Is there a reason for not naming this "Taiwan River ID" but using the name "Code of Taiwan River". Is there a reason for not treating this as an external ID? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChristianKl:At present, this code table does not have the official English name of WRA(Water Resources Agency, MOEA). "Code of Taiwan River" or "Taiwan River Code" is a literal translation of the official Chinese name. Of course, there is currently no river code called "Taiwan River ID" in Taiwan. --Allenwang6212a (talk) 01:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChristianKl, NMaia:I want to know if there are any questions about this discussion that have caused it to be shelved?--Allenwang6212a (talk) 07:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - The proposal is not blocked by anyone, it's just that nobody created it. From my perspective the nonstandard name would be a reason for me not to create it but I don't oppose others to create it. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wait per above. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SupportIt is need.--安可 (talk) 02:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]