Wikidata:Property proposal/Relationship Science profile ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Relationship Science profile ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Description | identifier for an organization in the Relationship Science database |
---|---|
Represents | Relationship Science (Q7310742) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | organization (Q43229) |
Allowed values | [a-z0-9\-]+ |
Example | Opera Software (Q52833902) → otello-corp-asa-521154 |
Source | https://relationshipscience.com |
External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
Planned use | To add RelSci IDs for organizations |
Number of IDs in source | 1.6 million organizations |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Formatter URL | https://relationshipscience.com/organization/$1 |
See also | Bloomberg company ID (P3377) |
Motivation
Extensive database on business entities, organizations and related persons. Gotitbro (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
- Support David (talk) 13:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose @Gotitbro: We can't have two formatter URLs as shown; so we either need two properties or to include the
organization/
andperson/
string as part of the ID. I'd favour the former. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)- I see, in that case yes including the organization string would be better. Gotitbro (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- On further examination, it seems that links like https://relationshipscience.com/organization/superior-auto-inc-25472233 and https://relationshipscience.com/stephan-ducharme-p4380827 will work, and redirect as appropriate. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- I see, in that case yes including the organization string would be better. Gotitbro (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Gotitbro: the simples way forward would probably be to restrict this proposal to one of the types (the one you want to get created first) and create a new proposal for the other type − Pintoch (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Done. I have edited the proposal for organizations only. Gotitbro (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
@Pintoch, Gotitbro, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Pigsonthewing: Done: Relationship Science organization ID (P5181). − Pintoch (talk) 08:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Why was this created, just fifteen minutes after the proposal was heavily refactored? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Restricting a proposal to one of the subtypes is a routine fix IMHO. Do you have any other concerns about the proposal? − Pintoch (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Why was this created, just fifteen minutes after the proposal was heavily refactored? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)