Wikidata:Property proposal/Acknowledgments

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acknowledged[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Done: acknowledged (P7137) (Talk and documentation)
Descriptionpersons or institutions acknoledged on a creative work
Representsacknowledgment (Q4674287)
Data typeItem
Domainmainly human (Q5), sometimes organization (Q43229) too
Example 1Le Club de l'horloge (1974-2002) (Q47020660)Claude Dargent (Q33110383), Yvan Blot (Q3573330), Jean-Yves Le Gallou (Q3170166) (etc.)
Example 2On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies (Q3020388)Michele Besso (Q124446)
Example 3Les Réseaux du Parti socialiste (Q65947956)Michel Offerlé (Q3310480)
Example 4Théorie des jeux et apprentissage pour les réseaux sans fil distribués (Q65964345)Thomas Lafforgue (Q65964323)
See alsodedicated to (P825), cites (P2860)
Proposed byNomen ad hoc

Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. OK. Even if the list can sometimes be super long in American books. Thierry Caro (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support David (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English label should probably be "acknowledged" or "acknowledges" (each statement would have a single value, not multiple, and verb form indicates relation)? ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
    Indeed, seems correct. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
    Edit : I would prefer "acknoledged", which I find more clear. The "acknoledger" (?) is the author himself, not the work, so stricto sensu the latter cannot really "acknoledge" anyone... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support if appropriately rephrased. StudiesWorld (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
    Now done. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC).
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Are we really going to fill this in for any more than a tiny fraction of potential items it could be used on? Is our data on this ever going to be comprehensive enough to be worth searching? Jheald (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
    • @Jheald: it seems that there have been previous efforts on this: en:Acknowledgment index. About our data being comprehensive enough, that is a problem with Wikicite as a whole I would say. − Pintoch (talk) 13:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Nomen ad hoc, Thierry Caro, ArthurPSmith, StudiesWorld, Jheald: ✓ Done: acknowledged (P7137). − Pintoch (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)