Wikidata:Property proposal/Løøv classification
Løøv classification[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Description | classification system for Sami works |
|---|---|
| Represents | Løøv classification (Q56686338) |
| Data type | String |
| Domain | work (Q386724) |
| Allowed values | ([01]\d|2[01])[a-k](1[ab]|[1-7])? |
| Example 1 | oai:urm_publish:990000738734702201 → 11d3, 04e |
| Example 2 | oai:urm_publish:990001497484702201 → 15a, 15i |
| Example 3 | oai:urm_publish:990001500104702201 → 08b |
| Source | https://www.nb.no/baser/samisk/klassifikasjon.html ; http://bibsys.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/oai/47BIBSYS_NETWORK/request?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=marc21&set=samisk |
| Planned use | I will use this when importing the Sami bibliography (around 26,000 works) to Wikidata |
| Robot and gadget jobs | All works with this classification will be added by bot |
Motivering/begrunnelse[edit]
I am working on importing the Sami bibliography from the Norwegian National Library (around 26,000 works) to Wikidata. Almost all of the works use this classification system in addition to Dewey Decimal Classification (P1036), so I think it would be good to have this as its own property to get as much completeness as possible to the imported items. Since I haven't started the import yet, the examples don't link to existing items, but to the entries for books from the bibliography in their API. Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 02:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support David (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)- Support Cwf97 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Pmt (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment Waiting for Qids in the examples to create the property. (Also, was a bot request filed for these 26,000 works? Or any other sign of consensus for inclusion?) − Pintoch (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): marking as not ready − Pintoch (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Sorry, I forgot to reply here when you first posted. I've been waiting to start a bot request until this property is created, because then everything would be ready for the script to start importing. But I can work around that and create some test items without this property included, so I will start a bot request shortly. Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): are you interested for this Property? If not, please use
|status=withdrawn. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)- @ZI Jony: Yes, I still am. Is anything blocking this? Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): nothing! can we mark as ready? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: That would be lovely! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): nothing! can we mark as ready? Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: Yes, I still am. Is anything blocking this? Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): are you interested for this Property? If not, please use
- @Pintoch: Sorry, I forgot to reply here when you first posted. I've been waiting to start a bot request until this property is created, because then everything would be ready for the script to start importing. But I can work around that and create some test items without this property included, so I will start a bot request shortly. Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): marking as not ready − Pintoch (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
@Jon Harald Søby (WMNO): 
Done. Please add examples to the property page once you have imported some. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 09:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)