Wikidata:Property proposal/Clubhouse account

Clubhouse account

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done

Description	account the person has on the plattform Clubhouse (Q104101703)
Data type	String
Domain	human (Q5)
Example 1	Marc Andreessen (Q62882) → @pmarca
Example 2	Mark Zuckerberg (Q36215) → @zuck23
Example 3	Elon Musk (Q317521) → @elonmusk
Example 4	Paul Nemitz (Q92306155) → @paulnemitz
Example 5	Eva Kaili (Q2420152) → @evakaili
Example 6	Damian Boeselager (Q63532607) → @dboeselager
Example 7	English (Q1860) → room/xX6Wylo2
Example 8	bitcoin (Q131723) → club/597
Example 9	artificial intelligence (Q11660) → club/10227
Planned use	add for politicians and other official people available on clubhouse and wikidata
Number of IDs in source	> 10 000
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://clubhub.site/$1

Motivation

Clubhouse (Q104101703) is a new active platform used by many politicians and other that also have a Wikidata object. Clubhouse is currently the 16th most popular app in the “Social Media Network” according to backlinko.com - Salgo60 (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Oppose Please split this in multiple properties e.g. "Clubhouse person" "clubhouse room", "clubhouse page". Also regex [a-z] is missing--So9q (talk) 07:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Wikidata will not scale if we should have a dedicated property for every concept at a target "source". Compare if two "Wikidata" sites should link each other. With your logic then we need 10 million properties if we have 10 million concepts - Salgo60 (talk) 08:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per So9q, it does not make sense to mix concepts like this. Should be split into different properties. --Hannes Röst (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose - We already solved this use case long ago. You just need to use website account on (P553) and then add a qualifier with website username or ID (P554) --Thadguidry (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose we should wait a while after something like this is created to make a property for it. make sure it maintains relevance for more than just a couple years. BrokenSegue (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose – let's give it a few years. The last thing we want is a glut of social media skeleton identifiers with the service no longer in existence. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 23:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

There is currently no consensus to create this property. That is why I am closing the discussion here. It may be that at a later point in time a consensus on creating the property can be reached. You can then propose the property again here. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)