I see you created Astrid Nyberg (Q105386497) on 8 February. Astrid Nyberg (Q101422014) has already been created last November. Perhaps you could merge them.--~~~~
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reply to "Duplicate entry for Astrid Nyberg"
Reply to "Riksdagen vs Ståndsriksdagen"
Reply to "Followed by for runestones?"
Reply to "Moved GitHub topic"
Reply to "Universal Code of Conduct consultation"
Reply to "Phabricator project "so9q""
Reply to "Help"
Reply to "Stuss"
Reply to "Q28343309"
About this board
Welcome to Wikidata, Salgo60!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, please ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]]. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Previous discussion was archived aton 2018-05-21.
Duplicate entry for Astrid Nyberg
Riksdagen vs Ståndsriksdagen
Jag tror att det är bättre att använda Member of the Riksdag of the Estates (Q82697153) än member of the Swedish Riksdag (Q10655178) för medlemmar i Ståndsriksdagen. Jag tänker på t.ex. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q26240019&oldid=1369979160
Followed by for runestones?
This seems strange. The stones don't really follow each other, they are not made in a series. It's just arbitrary id's that happen to be constructed by adding one to the next. But it is not really a series of stones and hence followed by (P156) doesn't make sense as it implies some actual order.
If you work with runestones and read books like
you will have the Runes in this order --> it makes sense to make it easy to navigate also in this order
Well, that only makes it an arbitrary order per book then, not an inherent property of the stone itself. The number is irrelevant. Followed by can be used as with as few as two items, but it should only be used if it actually is a sequential order of the item, not of the name of the item.
its a the sequential order in the "Runestone Biblebooks" and in the order they documented the Runestones...
Yes, so it's not a sequential order of themselves. But
|described by source|
on Upplands runinskrifter 1175 (Q28373557) would make sense.
Even better, nice!
nice you found a way forward 😃
Moved GitHub topic
Thanks this a new property and its a guessing ;-) see if the people in GITHUB likes this link
I feel it could be used also for us to easier find GITHUB repositories related to WIkidata and properties the future will tell
Magnus in Stockholm, Sweden
Universal Code of Conduct consultation
Hello, I am writing to you to personally invite you to the ongoing consultation about the new Wikimedia movement's Universal Code of Conduct. Your feedback as an experienced user is of great value for us, and we are extremely interested in hearing your say.
You might express your opinion at any given time and in any way you may consider useful (for example, publicly at the consultation page or on my talk page, or privately via email). If you wish or feel more comfortable, we can also set up an online meeting in order to discuss your opinions and ideas.
Please remember that there is no such thing as a “stupid opinion” or “worthless idea”, so be bold and feel free to express yourself. :) Also, if you wish you can help us involving other users you know and that you think might be interested in having their say in this!
Hope to hear from you soon!
Borrow your brain for enWS occupation categories?
The Wikisources as they have authors and biographical works have occupations of the people and of the works about the people, let alone works about the occupations irrespective of the people +++.
When set up, the occupational categorisation focused on those of the authors (author: ns) and the naming was kept simple to focus on that relationship. Problem is that we didn't tell the punters so they have been populated with biographies, and later they have been WD-ised so they are now quite dishevelled, and not fit for purpose. Anyway, I am (trying to) sort it out, and what was a simple plan is now needing some input from someone outside with a different (clearer? less polluted?) PoV. Can I borrow your brain somewhere/somehow to discuss and get a perspective that will better align with outside of enWS. This may also be part of a conversation of what is an occupation, versus what is a skill/approach. Thanks if you can, if you think that this may be better with someone else, then please point me in a direction. :-)
I am very confused with occupation and I am more a Wikidata person I see two wishes
Thank for the pointers. I grabbed your name at the WikiProject.
Phabricator project "so9q"
If you can help me make it as its own.... my skills was not good enough... I just weanted to have it "outside" my todo list
What about the Magnus Sälgö project? should it be a subproject of WMSE?
If possible not a subproject....
Can you help me with item Q104539108? I'm having trouble with Facebook page ID and YouTube channel ID identifiers.
The facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/intervencaoresgateanimal/
The youtube channel is https://www.youtube.com/c/IRAINTERVENÇÃOERESGATEANIMAL
Thank you very much!
What is Q104527705 about? Why is there a need for a duplicated item? All I see is a link to a redirect and redirects are not in itself notable.
Correct me if you have an idea I will try to explain my thought
I created a Lexeme Lexeme:L349292 = stuss
my thought was that this Lexeme should match the same meaning of the Qnumber even if its nearly the same.... so I created this object ..... and used Property:P5137 = this new object
stuss = Q104527705
stjärt = Q42165
My unskilled feeling is that Q104527705 was used much more in the old days and is more informal....
Items are not about words, they are about concepts. Lexemes can be informal or formal but items about an anatomical entity can't be formal or informal. If the difference between stuss and stjärt is only about formality the lexemes for them should point to the same Wikidata item.
Thanks I check in the Swedish Telegram group if the think its the same or not....
Update: we pointed for one sense L349292-S1 on the same item Q42165
L349292-S2 need another item...
Shouldn't the uncertainty in the source for birth date and death date show in wikidata? ~~~~
Checked out the video. before, not before, after, not after use latest date (P1326) and earliest date (P1319). But for around (omkring, cirka etc) I tried something but it did not work. We take it at next wikidata meeting