User talk:Teolemon

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Teolemon!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed JavaScript tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Teolemon/Archive 1 on 2016-07-12.

By clicking "Add topic", you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL
Prtksxna (talkcontribs)

Hey o/ Thanks for your contributions on the Delhi Metro connecting lines. You might like to take a look at Wikidata:WikiProject Delhi Metro :)

Reply to "Delhi Metro contributions"
Liuxinyu970226 (talkcontribs)

As you can see this is a placeholder of an Infobox, not a real image, so why do you instance of (P31) it?

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

I used harvest templates, and usually they are blacklisted to prevent addition. But It seems the blacklist doesn't extend to this one (I was working on the Chinese Wikipedia)

Reply to "Missing image text.svg"
Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Stop doing too many edits in small period of time, get a bot instead. This is making trouble for servers. If you continue with this speed I might need to block you due to bot policy.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

I had to block you, sorry. Tell me you stopped the process and I will unblock you.

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

I've stopped. Sorry.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Unblocked, please make a bot and continue doing so :) Thanks

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

I was using 6 windows of Harvest Template in // to harvest chunks of the same template.

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

you definitely should not do that without bot flag, and even with bots it should be kept around 60 edits per minute.

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

Ok, so it's about requesting the bot flag for my account and keeping it below the threshold, not the tool I actually use to edit (eg Harvest) ?

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Yes that's correct.

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

Is it ok to use Harvest Template ? With a single window, as it's meant to be used ?

Ladsgroup (talkcontribs)

Yes :)

Reply to "Stop"
VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Bonjour,

Je viens d'ajouter quelques contraintes sur Property talk:P3215. Je ne suis pas exactement familier avec le SIRET (j'ai un doute en voyant l'exemple, ce SIRET est-il vraiment pour Wikimédia France ou bien pour ses locaux ?), n'hésite pas à regarder, vérifier et compléter si besoin.

Par ailleurs, est-ce qu'il existe un site vers lequel on pourrait pointer ? (comme on pointe vers infogreffe pour le SIREN)

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

Hej,

Le SIRET est en cours de libération par le Gouvernement. Donc pour le moment, il n'y a pas de dépôt stable qui soit public.

Pour WmF, https://www.score3.fr/ASSOCIATION-WIKIMEDIA-FRANCE-481796464.shtml

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Super, sait-on comment (sous quelle forme, quelle licence, etc.) le fichier sera disponible ?

Pour WMFr, ce n'était pas exactement ma question. C'est une nuance subtile mais qui a des ramifications importantes : est-ce que l'on simplifie en mettant le code SIRET sur l'organisation ou bien est-ce que l'on respecte l'esprit du SIRET et on ne met le code que sur le siège de l'organisation.

Dans l'exemple de Wikimédia France, le siège ayant changé plusieurs fois, le SIRET a changé avec et je ne suis pas sur de savoir comment gérer cela (et du coup, je me rends compte que les contraintes que j'ai mises sont auto-contradictoires...).

Pour prendre un autre exemple, le SIRET doit-il aller sur Rennes (Q647) ou sur Rennes City Hall (Q532811) ? Il me semble que le mieux serait le second, non ?

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

Les fichiers sont dispos. Il faudrait les importer sur MixNMatch.

VIGNERON (talkcontribs)

Génial. Où sont-ils disponibles ?

Avant MixnMatch, on pourrait déjà faire un premier import automatique pour toutes les communes de France (pas de trop de pièges, l'import sera facile à faire, et pour auto-répondre à ma question, le siret de la commune de Rennes est bien plus logique sur Rennes (Q647)).

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/base-sirene-des-entreprises-et-de-leurs-etablissements-siren-siret/

Reply to "SIRET"
ValterVB (talkcontribs)

In RFD there are one or more item proposed for the deletion created by you. If you do not agree you can participate in the debate --ValterVB (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply to "Item to be delete"
Jklamo (talkcontribs)

Hi, when adding COA images to person items, there is a specific property for that (coat of arms image (P94)), so it is much better to add them to that property and not to image (P18).

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

Harvested from the image field in a biography infobox. Duh :-(

Jklamo (talkcontribs)

That is why importing P18 from infoboxes is a bit tricky (also grave pictures). I usually do a fast check of harvested filenames just after harvest and also some queries like may help. Also test edits, when majority of harvested images are COA or graves, it usually means that infobox was already harvested. There is also a bit dirty "solution" placing P:P18:novalue.

Reply to "COA images"
Pasleim (talkcontribs)

This is a kind reminder that the following properties were created more than six months ago: CNO-11 occupation code (P1022), SBFI occupation code (P1024). As of today, these properties are used on less than five items. As the proposer of these properties you probably want to change the unfortunate situation by adding a few statements to items. --Pasleim (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t40/cno11&file=inebase

Reply to "Unused properties"
Gerd Fahrenhorst (talkcontribs)

Hi Teolomon, in nearly all languages Q494312 refers to a type of machine, while the French language is linked to a Company. Could you please separate the French link to a new Q entry, and undo your last Change to Q494312? -- ~~~~

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

done

Reply to "Photomaton Q494312"
Kopiersperre (talkcontribs)

Bonjour Teolemon,

I've found out, that many non-UK companies have legal form (P1454):public limited company (Q5225895) set, which is impossible.

You've imported this statement e.g. at Chiquita Brands International (Q1074666). Do you know what went wrong? I am planning to write a manual for importing company data, so I'm interested in this.

Teolemon (talkcontribs)

It has been imported from the French Wikipedia using Harvest Templates, which has "Privé" which links to Private Company which redirects to "Private Limited Company"

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita_Brands_International

And I'm really embarrassed.

Kopiersperre (talkcontribs)

Not your fault. The man who harvested German Wikipedias templates ran into the same error, because of wrong interwikis.

Reply to "Legal forms of companies"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"