Talk:Q106196143
Autodescription — Tyler Weitzman (Q106196143)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Tyler Weitzman” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Interwiki Conflict
[edit]User:Matěj_Suchánek thanks for resolving the interwiki conflict for this page. I have also read your explanation about the CloneBot link. What I have gone ahead and done to account for "CloneBot" and "Tyler Weitzman" being different things is create a separate entry for CloneBot which uses the Wikiversity v:CloneBot link, and I have made reference to CloneBot from the "Tyler Weitzman" entry under its notable work property. I have also added the relevant s:Author:Tyler_Weitzman author page link to to the Wikisource field so that this entry remains with a valid Wiki site link. Let me know if this makes sense, thanks! DarrowStormBlessed (talk) 09:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Accidental Deletion
[edit]Documenting discussion about this item from User_talk:Lymantria#Deletion_of_Tyler_Weitzman:
Hi Lymantria, you recently deleted Tyler Weitzman as not meeting the notability criteria. May I ask why you deleted it? The page met criterias 1 and 3 as it had a valid sitelink to s:Author:Tyler_Weitzman and it met a structural need for other pages including CloneBot, as well as several articles outside of Wikidata (on Wikiquotes, Wikisource 1, Wikisource 2, and Wikiversity) which hyperlinked to Tyler Weitzman, and now have broken URLs. DarrowStormBlessed (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- The item did not meet criterium 1, as there is not valid site link at the item. It did not meet criterium 3, as there was only one incoming link from CloneBot, for which it was not making the item more useful (the other way around may have been the case). So I stand by my decision to delete. You may however write a request at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, to see if other admins support my decision. Lymantria (talk) 06:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response, I will take a look at doing so. I would also like to point out that while I agree that criterium 3 is quite subjective in this case, Subpart 5 of criterium 1 of the notability policy clearly states that author pages are valid links: "On Wikisource, items for mainspace pages, Author pages, Translation pages, and Portal pages are valid, along with items for namespaces that exist on other Wikimedia sites (Category, Project...) (Wikidata:Notability)" DarrowStormBlessed (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- I overlooked the site link to enwikisource. My apologies. Restored. Lymantria (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Easy to overlook when it's further down :) cancelling the administrator's notice I was drafting. Thanks DarrowStormBlessed (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)