Property talk:P9929

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

Representsmadhhab (Q209928)
Data typeItem
Domainhuman (Q5), territorial entity type (Q104098715), country (Q6256), physical location (Q17334923), ethnic group (Q41710), Islamic organization (Q110706912) or religious movement (Q1826286)
Allowed valuesHanafism (Q228986), Hanbalism (Q233387), Malikism (Q48221), Shafi`i (Q82245), Isma'ilism (Q230386), Ja'fari jurisprudence (Q685567), Zaidiyyah (Q144333), Ibadi Islam (Q243551), Ẓāhirī (Q140592) or Al-Mawardi (Q335635)
ExampleAbu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari (Q316349)Shafi`i (Q82245)
Morocco (Q1028)Malikism (Q48221)
Al-Mawardi (Q335635)Shafi`i (Q82245)
Abu Dawood (Q336558)Hanbalism (Q233387)
Jābir ibn Zayd (Q6035355)Ibadi Islam (Q243551)
Muhammad al-Shaybani (Q293612)Hanafism (Q228986)
Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni (Q2973730)Ja'fari jurisprudence (Q685567)
Idris Imad al-Din (Q7660476)Isma'ilism (Q230386)
See alsoreligion or worldview (P140), official religion (P3075), movement (P135)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total745
Main statement71295.6% of uses
Qualifier314.2% of uses
Reference20.3% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9929#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9929#Entity types
None of Islam (Q432), Sunni Islam (Q483654), Sufism (Q9603), Shia Islam (Q9585), Salafism (Q191057): value must not be any of the specified items.
Replacement property:
Replacement values: (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9929#none of, SPARQL
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): Wikimedia list article (Q13406463), madhhab (Q209928): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9929#Conflicts with P31, SPARQL
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9929#citation needed
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Moved from user talk:E4024[edit]

What do you think about the allowed values of the madhab property?--Trade (talk) 03:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. Mezhep? Sünni? That's a mezhep for me. --E4024 (talk) 03:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand @E4024:--Trade (talk) 17:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if i change all whose madhab are Hanbali from religion > islam to religion > sunni islam? @E4024: --Trade (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is OK when you add things with "reliable sources". (I saw you adding things like this to an early Turkish feminist, an emancipated Ottoman woman; if you can find a reliable source to that I would consider not reviewing your edits. This is a joke. :) We should only make additions with reliable sources when we poke our noses into such an intimate personal area such as religion. --E4024 (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I began a proper discussion open to all -and not a bilateral conversation- at WD Project chat on this issue. Everybody welcome. --E4024 (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]