Property talk:P5221

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

Tree of Life Web Project ID
identifier in the Tree of Life Web Project
[create] Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5221#Single value, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5221#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value), SPARQL (new)
Type “taxon (Q16521): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5221#type Q16521, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Format “[1-9]\d*: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5221#Format, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)

Format[edit]

@Mr. Fulano, Pigsonthewing, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Uomovariabile: Hello. Have you guys noticed my message there? Not paying enough attention to format as a regular expression (P1793), I have imported a few alphabetical IDs from Template:Tolweb (Q14447419) through Harvest Templates (Q21914398). Now I'm left wondering. Should I remove them and respect the proposal or should we actually change the regex from numerical IDs to alphabetical ones because this is how they are currently stored on Wikipedias? The Tree of Life website seems to accept both. Thierry Caro (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Thierry Caro: I think that you can change the regex, if the alfabetical IDs are working. And I didn't see your message on proposal, so, sorry for that. Mr. Fulano! Talk 18:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
@Thierry Caro: Sorry but I didn't see your message. I'm not an expert but generally, working with QS, I prefer the numerical IDs, if accepted (in fact I did a test by entering numeric values manually p.e. Atelopus (Q780071) and, as you said, it works correctly). On the other hand, it seems to me that browsing TOL, the alphabetical suffix is much more intuitive. For this reason changing the regex is probably the best solution. Dunno if i'm not considering the technical issues. --Uomovariabile (talk to me) 08:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
@Mr. Fulano, Uomovariabile: Thank you. I think we will stick to the numbers, eventually. Links such as http://tolweb.org/Ammonoidea bring one to the page about Cephalopods (Q128257) through a redirect and I don't think we want this to happen. Thank you for your answers whatever! Thierry Caro (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)