Property talk:P1128

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

employees
total number of employees of a company at a given "point in time" (P585). Most recent data would generally have preferred rank; data for previous years normal rank (not deprecated rank). Add data for recent years, don't overwrite
DescriptionTotal number of employees of a company or administration at a specified point in time
Representsemployee (Q703534)
Has qualitycomplex constraint recency (Q102173107)
Data typeQuantity
Domain
According to this template: Country, region and city articles for the Global Economic Map. Company articles
According to statements in the property:
organization (Q43229)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values
According to this template: positive integers
According to statements in the property:
0 ≤ 𝓧 ≤ 3,000,000
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed unitsnot applicable
Example
According to this template:

General Electric (Q54173) employees (P1128) 117,000

qualified with: sourcing circumstances (P1480) ==> circa (Q5727902)
point in time (P585) ==>31 dec 2014
According to statements in the property:
Škoda Auto (Q29637) → 33,696
AXA (Q160054) → 120,869
ABB Group (Q52825) → 110,000
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Sourcehttps://opencorporates.com
Robot and gadget jobsDeltaBot does the following jobs:
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P1128 (Q20990047)
Tracking: local yes, WD nono label (Q101364241)
See alsostudents count (P2196), member count (P2124), number of volunteers (P6125)
Lists
  • Items with the most statements of this property
  • Count of items by number of statements (chart)
  • Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart)
  • Items with the most identifier properties
  • Items with no other statements
  • Most recently created items
  • Items with novalue claims
  • Items with unknown value claims
  • Usage history (total)
  • Chart by item creation date
  • Minimum and maximum
  • User:Laboramus/Units/P1128 (Units used)
  • Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1128
  • Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128
  • Map
  • Random list
  • Proposal discussionProposal discussion
    Current uses
    Total117,352
    Main statement117,335>99.9% of uses
    Qualifier15<0.1% of uses
    Reference2<0.1% of uses
    [create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
    Type “organization (Q43229): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “organization (Q43229)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Type Q43229, SPARQL
    Units: “novalue”: value unit must be one of listed. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Units
    Required qualifier “point in time (P585): this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
    Range from “0” to “3000000”: values should be in the range from “0” to “3000000”. (Help)
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Range, hourly updated report
    Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#citation needed
    Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Single value, SPARQL
    Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Entity types
    Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
    List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1128#Scope, SPARQL
    Recency
    point in time (P585)-qualifier of values shouldn't be older than the duration set at Property:P1128#P1552 with complex constraint recency (Q102173107) (Help)
    Violations query: SELECT ?item ?dt ?age_days ( ROUND((now() - ?dt) / ?factor ) as ?age) WHERE { hint:Query hint:optimizer "None". wd:P1128 p:P1552 [ ps:P1552 wd:Q102173107 ; pq:P2047 ?duration ; pqv:P2047 / wikibase:quantityUnit ?unit ] . ?unit p:P2442 / psv:P2442 [ wikibase:quantityUnit wd:Q573 ; wikibase:quantityAmount ?factor ] BIND(?duration * ?factor as ?maxagedays) ?item p:P1128 ?st . ?st pq:P585 ?dt . FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item p:P1128 / pq:P585 ?dt0 . FILTER( ?dt0 > ?dt) } ?st ps:P1128 ?value . BIND( ROUND(now() - ?dt) as ?age_days) FILTER( ?age_days > ?maxagedays) FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P576 [] } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P3999 [] } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P582 [] } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P570 [] } } LIMIT 500
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1128#Recency
    This property is being used by:

    Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

    label (ru)[edit]

    сотрудников - чего сотрудников? Набирают, увольняют, эксплуатируют, бьют, насилуют? --Fractaler (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Distinguishing types of employees[edit]

    For a college, I'm trying to specify a distinction between academic staff and administrative staff by saying 240 employees with qualifier "applies to part" faculty and 247 employees with qualifier "applies to part" administrative staff. But of (P642) isn't a valid qualifier for this property. Is there another way to do this? Help? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Why you want to use of (P642) instead of applies to part (P518)? Wostr (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops, I should've used P518. That worked; thanks! {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    FTEs[edit]

    If the employees of an organisation are listed in terms of FTEs - Q1543700 (Full-time equivalents) - then Q52848401 (integer constraint) should not be an obligatory constraint. For tiny organisations like NGOs, e.g. EEPA = Q104688496, a new Wikipedia user felt upset about seeing an integer number of employees that was a lot bigger than the number of FTEs officially declared in European Commission registration.

    Would it be worth lifting this constraint? or would it be better to create a new element which is 'number of FTEs' instead of 'number of employees'? Boud (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Add male/ and female population[edit]

    Can I add male and female population as qualifiers? Germartin1 (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm sorry, but I think this addition was not useful. "Female/male population" requires country (P17) and population (P1082) - but country (P17) cannot be specified for an international company and population (P1082) is inappropriate, instead it is employees (P1128).
    I think that two new properties would make sense for this, e.g. "number of females/males", of which "female/male population" could then each be a sub-property. Buffty (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]