Wikidata:Property proposal/Glitchwave game ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Glitchwave game ID[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

Descriptionidentifier for a video game's main entry on Glitchwave
RepresentsGlitchwave (Q108223206)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainvideo game (Q7889)
Example 1Minecraft (Q49740)minecraft
Example 2Super Mario Bros. 3 (Q639619)super-mario-bros-3
Example 3Disco Elysium (Q71693825)disco-elysium
Example 4The Sims 4 (Q12579896)the-sims-4
SourceGlitchwave FAQ, Glitchwave homepage for number of games
Number of IDs in source48381
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Implied notabilityWikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320)
Formatter URLhttps://glitchwave.com/game/$1/
See alsoGlitchwave genre ID (P10049); external IDs for the associated site Rate Your Music (Q1145963)
Wikidata projectWikiProject Video games (Q8485882)

Motivation[edit]

Although the site is still in open beta, Glitchwave has a good amount of video games and ratings and it can be useful to cross-reference with other game databases and sources.

Notes: Glitchwave games are added in a similar manner to the Discogs master x release logic: there is the main/generic entry, which would be represented by this ID, and the specific game releases, e.g. the 1988 original Super Mario Bros. 3 NES release vs. the 2007 Wii downloadable version. According to the developers, in the future, Rate Your Music releases will function in a similar way (when the transition to Sonemic is completed.--Guttitto (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

applsdev Arlo Barnes BugWarp Coloradohusky CptViraj Cupkake4Yoshi Cwf97 Cynde Moya Danrok Datumizer Dexxor Diggr Dispenser Dollarsign8 DoublePendulumAttractor EdoAug Edolusill Eniehack Facenapalm Floyd-out FullyAwesome Harshrathod50 Jean-Frédéric Jotamide Keplersj Kirilloparma Lewis Hulbert LotsofTheories Macocobovi Macrike Master Of Ninja Matthias M. Metafire18 Nicereddy Nw520 Oduci Poslovitch Rampagingcarrot RampantSpirit Sanqui Santer Sight Contamination Sir Lothar thgiex Tomodachi94 VGPaleontologist Wd-Ryan WikiSyn YotaMoteuchi

Notified participants of WikiProject Video games --Guttitto (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I agree with Jean-Fred regarding the lack of numeric IDs, but I don't think that has really blocked identifiers in the past, so shrug. Nicereddy (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, does Glitchwave have any links to external sources (Steam, IGDB, etc)? And was the database pre-populated from a specific source? Nicereddy (talk) 01:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They do have media links like RYM, for instance Minecraft should have 2 trailers and 2 Bandcamp releases attached to it but they don't seem to be showing up properly on the game page right now so you can see them here. About sources, the ones that were allowed or not allowed were previously listed on this thread, but according to this recent one, sourcing will become less restrictive. Either way, sources/meta-comments are required for all submissions, the general RYM sourcing principles also apply to Glitchwave. Guttitto (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, my point is not about the lack of numeric IDs (that’s indeed not a requirement), but that there /are/ numeric IDs, which are not even hidden into the depths of the HTML source code but prominently displayed (compare to say the MobyGames numeric ID, which exists but only in the API ; or the IGDB ID which for a long time was only visible in source code): these are clearly the persistent ones and beg to be used, only the formatter URL is missing. But the lack of formatter URL has also never blocked identifiers in the past either so… :) Jean-Fred (talk) 09:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I remember, the site administration has explicitly stated (in past year) that they do not make these numeric IDs external, to prevent parsing spam, both for RYM and Glitchwave. (They have a pretty awful firewall system that blocks by IP instantly even with measured page scanning and they remove bans manually within a week or so.) Solidest (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. If these IDs are not externally resolvable by design, then that puts this discussion to rest :) Jean-Fred (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]