User talk:Malore

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Changes to platform property (P400)

Maxxisti (talkcontribs)

The changes you've made to this property have caused issues with it's use in video games (instance of Q7889), it seems like it's been narrowly defined as a hardware platform? (In the case of video games they are software that can run on bare hardware, as software running on an OS, or within a virtual machine environment.) A lof of the other property checks are on the basis of platform being present. I'm not aware all the other issues related to this property, but I'm wondering if this change should this be reviewed. Do you have any thoughts?

Malore (talkcontribs)

The changes I made were done in order to extend the scope of the property to virtual machines, PAAS, browsers, software frameworks and apps beyond hardware and OS. The problem is that currently none of them is a subclass of computing platform (Q241317). We could adjust the computing platform ontology or we could explicitly require the value of platform (P400) to be an instance of operating system (Q9135), web browser (Q6368), virtual machine (Q192726), platform as a service (Q1153767), software framework (Q271680) and computer hardware (Q3966) (maybe computer hardware (Q3966) is too wide).

Reply to "Changes to platform property (P400)"
Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)
Malore (talkcontribs)

You're perfectly right. My fault. Thank you for pointing it out.

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

No probs ;)

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

So there are 1452 of these...

They can be fixed via a report & quickstatements ... happy to assist if you'd like. Do they all have ETSI standard & European norm? Let me know if you want a hand.

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

Sorry - report is borked because template madness ... I'll try to fix that. ... now fixed

Malore (talkcontribs)

Yes, I added them all with QuickStatements but I didn't noted the mistake. To solve the problem we need to find all the ids of the affected items. Do you know of a way to quickly do it?

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

Sure - the report, above, lists the items with this issue. We can take the first column, and then in QS, remove the P1462, and then reinsert the P1462 and a couple of P31s. Simples :)

Malore (talkcontribs)

OK, thank you very much. I'll do that.

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

No probs. Enjoy!

Malore (talkcontribs)

Now it should be OK.

Tagishsimon (talkcontribs)

Agreed; is good. Thanks.

Malore (talkcontribs)

Thanks to yo

Reply to "Q52161288"
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

I think your QuickStatements batch got the wrong entity.

Malore (talkcontribs)

Thank you very much. I typed P698 instead of Q698. I'm sorry.

Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Np. Happens to most of us once in a while.

I thought it might be some interesting info on software they are running.

Reply to "P698"
Sjoerddebruin (talkcontribs)
Malore (talkcontribs)

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)


Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 13:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016"
There are no older topics