Topic on User talk:Bovlb

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2A01:4F8:C010:72A7:0:0:0:1 (talkcontribs)

Hi dear. Please help me. Mohamadreza sadeghi item deleted. Please help me and re create this.

This item Q117749810 and Q117744150.


Please fix this. It's person famous and have more reference

Bovlb (talkcontribs)

Hi! Thanks for following up. If you look at User_talk:91.251.206.62, you will find an explanation of why this item was deleted, and a link to instructions on how to appeal this decision. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jack bros (talkcontribs)

I am sure you are a very logical and personable person. I request you to please check this matter for me and fix it if possible. Because it is really important for me. I have a desperate request from you. Thanks

89.198.141.112 (talkcontribs)

Please help me I have an appeal on this article. Please check again and fix the problem. I am a new user on Wikidata. If possible please help me and revise. Thankful

Bovlb (talkcontribs)

I have reviewed Q117749810 and Q117744150, and I am certain that they refer to the same entity, so the former was correctly deleted as a recreation of a deleted item.

I have also reviewed the two sources provided in the items and the zero additional sources you have provided here. These do not appear to be substantive independent sources that would establish notability. I therefore see no reason to overturn the deletion decision. I see that you have also appealed directly to the deleting admin with the same result.

If you wish to contribute to this project, you might like to consider creating items on more notable entities or helping to improve some of our existing items.

Jack bros (talkcontribs)

I can provide independent and powerful resources. Can I create the page again and improve the resources?

Jack bros (talkcontribs)

Shure but this person very reference in Persian language.Request for reconsideration and once let me create the project again with better quality. I will add more powerful resources and I won't let you down. Please allow me to create one more time. Thank you for your cooperation.

Jack bros (talkcontribs)

Please please give me this chance.

Bovlb (talkcontribs)

That's not how it works. As was explained very clearly in the link I gave you, you should present your best evidence when you make your appeal. You have now blown through at least three appeals with no additional evidence provided. We're taking this as an indication that there is no additional evidence available.

And why is this such an emergency? Why can't you move on to working on something more notable?