Hi Amir,
Would you revise your comment at ? We still seek a reference for the suggested change. Consensus or not this is needed. The proposer has provided one that we think is questionable.
Topic on User talk:Ladsgroup
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hey, why do you think Property_talk:P17#Proposal_for_solution_I is not enough for consensus? Feel free to seek for third party opinion.
As for any statement, we need a reference that supports this. See the comment by Andrew Gray (talk) 22:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC) in the section above.
I read that part and couldn't find any reason to on hold the consensuses. TLDR of his comment is that "I'd be happy with either" and "Neither is perfect, but either is defensible". As I told you, feel free to ask another admin (probably in WD:AN) for a third party opinion.
The question is the reference. Andrew Gray writes "The quote on p. 885 of Saul & Stephens is a bit of an odd one to pick". If you think it's a good reference for the point, it might be worth saying that there.
You can talk to User:Kaldari
Given that it's malfunctioning, I asked it to be blocked.