Property talk:P2999

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• Units
• Scale of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

age of consent
youngest age at which a person can legally consent to sexual activity

Description	the age at which a person is considered to be legally competent to consent to sexual acts
Represents	age of consent (Q327538)
Data type	Quantity
Domain	places (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
Allowed values	12-19, novalue (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
Allowed units	years old (Q24564698)
Example	New South Wales (Q3224) → 16 years old Japan (Q17) → 13 years old
Source	Wikipedia (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896))
See also	marriageable age (P3000)
Lists	list of age restrictions (Q25037134) Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Minimum and maximum Items with highest numeric value Items with lowest numeric value User:Laboramus/Units/P2999 (Units used) Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 29 Main statement 27 93.1% of uses Qualifier 2 6.9% of uses

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Units: “years old (Q24564698)”: value unit must be one of listed. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999#Units

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999#citation needed

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999#Entity types

Integer: values should be integers (ie. they shouldn't have a fractional part) (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2999#integer, SPARQL

Some problems

Here the law tells 15 or 18 depending on what aspect you mean. Not entirely easy to explain the differences. The law also tells: "skall inte dömas till ansvar om det är uppenbart att gärningen inte inneburit något övergrepp mot barnet med hänsyn till den ringa skillnaden i ålder och utveckling mellan den som har begått gärningen och barnet samt omständigheterna i övrigt". That tells more about the differences in maturity between the two than a simple number can. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Personally, I'd add several statements with a qualifier linking to an item that gives some information to what it applies.
--- Jura 11:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Since I myself has been involved in some legal cases recently (as a proxy) I have learned that there in many cases is not decided if something is legal or not until it has been reviewed by a court or a prosecutor. This definitely looks like such a case. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)