Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Bynoyok
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Closing as unsuccessful--Ymblanter (talk) 05:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bynoyok[edit]
RfP scheduled to end after 10 October 2017 17:51 (UTC)
- Bynoyok (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Blurb... (a short statement why you (or this person) should be an admin...) Your signature's timestamp for a self-nom is when the candidacy starts. For non-self-noms, the candidate should "accept" with a short statement and sign it... that timestamp is when the candidacy starts... Once this is done please transclude your candidacy on the relevant request for permissions page. --117.136.38.174 17:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Votes[edit]
- Strong oppose - Only edits on Wikidata so far are this request. Mbch331 (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mbch331: Are you sure? --Rschen7754 18:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rschen7754: - With this account: yes. - Mbch331 (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2:
It is very inappropriate to be changing other editor's votes. Please do not do this again.--Rschen7754 18:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]- @Rschen7754: I have reverted vandalism by IP.Greetings ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: My apologies. --Rschen7754 18:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rschen7754: I have reverted vandalism by IP.Greetings ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2:
- @Rschen7754: - With this account: yes. - Mbch331 (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mbch331: Are you sure? --Rschen7754 18:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose No statement, created while logged out, careless errors, and only 4 edits globally. Not the sort of experience or level of care we want from an admin. --Rschen7754 18:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose this was surely created in error? Definitely I see no reason to support this. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose. Per above. Rzuwig► 19:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose nope. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments[edit]
- ...