Wikidata:Property proposal/Gedong Kirtya classification
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gedong Kirtya classification[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Description | classification of Balinese palm-leaf manuscript based by Nyoman Kadjeng |
---|---|
Represents | Gedong Kirtya classification (Q105830123) |
Data type | Item |
Domain | item |
Example 1 | Acin-acin Ida Bhathara (Q99406302) → Weda (Q104080336) |
Example 2 | Regulations of Silangjana Village (Q99414108) → agama (Q104080293) |
Example 3 | Uṣadha (Q104521885) → Wariga (Q104080231) |
Example 4 | Nagarakretagama (Q49335) → Itihasa (Q104080182) |
Example 5 | Babad Bali Dwipa (Q104529414) → Babad (Q104080118) |
Source |
Motivation[edit]
Nyoman Kadjeng (1929) is arranged lontar at Gedong Kirtya Museum into seven classifications:
- Weda consists of : Weda, Mantra and Kalpasastra
- Agama consists of : Palakerta, Sasana and Niti Sastra
- Wariga consists of: Wariga (Astrologische warken), Tutur (Onderricht), Kanda, (Handboeken) and Usada
- Ithihasa consists of : Parwa, Kakawin, Kidung and Geguritan
- Babad consists of : Pamancangah, History of Kingdom, Usada and Uwug.
- Tantri consists of: tantri, satwa and surat pangeling-eling
- Lalampahan
This classification still use on other Museum and right now all the palm leaf manuscript items still use genre on Wikidata.
Chinamoonroll (talk) 03:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
- Support - We need to have this classification for balinese palm-leaf manuscripts. It will also support the Balinese WikiLontar project. Thanks. Joseagush (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support - this clasification have used for making easy who clasified balinese palm-manuscript into same category. Beside support Balinese WikiLontar project this clasification also support wikipustaka where places for thousand manuscripts. Thank You Carma citrawati (talk)
- Support - This classification will be a great help for categorizing Balinese lontar manuscript especially for the Balinese WikiLontar project. Eka343 (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Chinamoonroll: Any particular reason why "genre" is inappropriate or inadequate for your purposes? Mahir256 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Mahir256: "Genre" is a temporary use and I propose this to improve it, I give an example Gaguritan Nengah Jimbaran, a manuscript about a husband looking for his wife in heaven, is a genre romance, but this classification put it into Itihasa. Then Regulations of Silangjana Village (Q99414108) can't be included in any genre.(talk) 02:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support useful categorization for Balinese Wikimedians' project. dwf² ✉ 13:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)