Vikiveri:Sözlükbilimsel veri/SSS

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikidata:Lexicographical data/Wiktionary FAQ and the translation is 22% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Genel bakış

 

Development plan

 

How to help

 

SSS

 

Tartışma

 

Wikidata:Wiktionary

Bu proje Vikisözlük kullanıcıları için neden yararlı olacak?

Vikisözlük'e katkıda bulunanlar—bir maddede; maddeye, veya bir şablona dayalı olarak—Vikiveri'den veri almayı seçip Vikisözlük içerisinde görüntüleyebilirler. Bu sayede, mesela, Endonzece Vikisözlük topluluğu Estonca maddeleri çoğaltmak istediğinde, Endonezce Vikisözlük kullanıcılarından bir grubun çıkıp Estonca madde oluşturmayı hedefleyen bir proje oluşturmalarını beklemek yerine bu verileri Vikiveri'den alabilirler. Veriler, muhafaza edilebilecek merkezi bir yerde bulunacak ve tüm projeler tarafından erişilebilecek.

Ek olarak, bu verileri yapılandırılmış makine-okumalı yöntem ile erişilebilir kılmak, Vikisözlük çapında bir araç ekosistemi besleyecek. Bu araçlar var olan katkı sağlayanlar için yararlı olacak, ama ayrıca Vikisözlük'ü büyük bir sayıda üretici yeni kullanıcılara açacak.

Bir veritabanına nasıl sözlüksel veri ekleyebilirsiniz?

The data model for Wiktionary is based on current research in lexicography and in analyzing the usage patterns on the Wiktionary projects. The data model is very flexible and will—as for Wikidata —be under the control of the community. Nevertheless, we don’t expect that all information from Wiktionary will be transferable to Wikidata—and that is expected. In the end, if we can support a large amount of the data in Wikidata, that already can be extremely helpful to the Wiktionary communities, and allow them to focus on the more challenging parts of the language within the respective communities. Wikidata does not have to be complete in order to be useful.

Why do we need the data to be machine-readable?

If we want to share the data between different Wiktionary communities we need to have the data in a machine-readable way. It will also help with writing scripts who check the consistency and completeness of the data—Wikidata shows the large number of tests and constraints that have been written on top of Wikidata which have been far too hard to write before Wikidata was available. Making the data accessible will help with increasing quality and coverage for the human reader, and with decreasing maintenance costs for the human contributors.

Many tools that people would like to build are currently impossible or too hard to build because of the lack of structured machine-readable data. While individual language versions of Wiktionary do structure their data to a certain extent, it is not uniform and queriable for tools that should work on all of Wiktionaries data.

Will all the information be transferred from Wiktionary to Wikidata?

This is very unlikely, if not impossible. As stated above, it is expected that the data model in Wikidata will not be sufficient to express all lexical information that is currently in Wiktionary.

Wiktionary will always have more flexibility than Wikidata. There is plenty of content and community organisation work that is being done on the Wiktionaries that cannot be transferred to Wikidata. Wikidata is just a tool to support the Wiktionary and other Wikimedia projects—it is not capable of replacing them and it should not be used with that goal.

Will we be forced to make use of Wikidata’s data?

The Wikidata development team will not force any project, Wiktionary or others, to use Wikidata’s data, or force their editors to edit on Wikidata. It’s up to the individual projects and editors to decide which parts and what data from Wikidata will be useful for them.

The Wikidata development team’s understanding is that we provide the tools, and the editors decide whether to use them or not.

Will it be more difficult to contribute to Wiktionary?

If anything, it should be easier—albeit different. Many Wiktionary projects have a very strong reliance on templates, and it is clear that people who have spent considerable time using those templates have likely developed a certain affinity to these workflows. But such templates can also be a barrier for new contributors. It has been observed that many Wikimedia projects that integrated Wikidata into their editing workflow have received a significant influx of new contributors working on Wikidata-related tasks.

All Wiktionary contributors will be more than welcome on Wikidata, but they will also be able to stay within Wiktionary and do the work that is available there. In the end, Wikidata will hopefully be empowering to all current and future contributors to Wiktionary.