Wikidata:Edit groups/QSv2/70265
< Wikidata:Edit groups | QSv2
Edit group QSv2/70265
| Summary | {{{summary}}} | Author | CaLéValab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of edits | 3,080 (more statistics) | Example edit | Q625764 |
Discussion[edit]
@CaLéValab: I quite agree with this batch − I never liked items such as science fiction video game (Q27670585) or fantasy anime and manga (Q15637301) − but was this replacement discussed anywhere? Jean-Fred (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Jean-Fred,
- It seems like this issue have been discussed many times on the book wikiproject (but I didn't go through every discussion).
- I've been said yesterday on my discussion page, by @EncycloPetey: "We are moving towards disentangling "form" of a work from "genre" of a work. So "genre" should merely be genre, not an intersection of form (play) and genre (comedy). Otherwise, we will have comedy play, comedy teleplay, comedy film, comedy novel, comedy short story, etc. Each of those things should be separated into "form" and "genre". The group organizing musical works has already started making those changes, and I hope the book / literature group will follow soon".
- This batch is one of the few I made to make the literature wikidata in accordance with this new policy.
- CaLéValab (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer! That’s fine by me − although I do think a clear "mandate" (ideally linked from the batch description or the edit summary) is good to have so that other editors understand the reasoning, and that it is not just the opinion of one single user but a clear project consensus. :) Jean-Fred (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Je passe en français pour essayer de comprendre. Lorsque vous dites "mandate", vous pensez à un mandat ? Un message de la communauté qui dirait "Vas-y CaLéValab, on te laisse faire le batch pour mettre le wikidata littérature aux nouvelles normes", et que je mettrais alors en lien dans la description du batch ? CaLéValab (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oui en gros − disons que quand je vois passer ce genre de modifs à grande échelle, la question que c’est toujours “Est-ce l’opinion d’une seule personne, peut-être bien informée peut-être pas ; ou bien est-ce le consensus d’un projet / d’un groupe de contributeurs ». Pas besoin d’une request for comment avec le soutien de 50 personnes hein :) Mais si dans le résumé de modification ya un lien vers une discussion du wikiprojet idione (Books en l’occurrence) où au moins une autre personne semble être d’accord − moi ça me suffit :) Jean-Fred (talk) 20:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Je passe en français pour essayer de comprendre. Lorsque vous dites "mandate", vous pensez à un mandat ? Un message de la communauté qui dirait "Vas-y CaLéValab, on te laisse faire le batch pour mettre le wikidata littérature aux nouvelles normes", et que je mettrais alors en lien dans la description du batch ? CaLéValab (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer! That’s fine by me − although I do think a clear "mandate" (ideally linked from the batch description or the edit summary) is good to have so that other editors understand the reasoning, and that it is not just the opinion of one single user but a clear project consensus. :) Jean-Fred (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)