User talk:Ainali

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Ainali/Archive 1 on 2015-08-10.

Why add en label to >100 languages?

6
Llywelyn2000 (talkcontribs)
Ainali (talkcontribs)
90.227.175.244 (talkcontribs)

Du kan inte bara skylla på roboten. Det var du som valde att slå ihop ett grensideobjekt med ett "vanligt" objekt och flytta dit alla grensidebeskrivningar och -etiketter. (Det kan säkert diskuteras hur meningsfullt det är att robotar lägger till alla de beskrivningarna, men jag antar att de någon gång godkänts för den uppgiften.)


Angående dina återställningar: Har du kollat diffen? Vad jag kan se är allt (i alla fall de med latinska tecken) beskrivningar av grensidor och alla etiketter är engelska. Det enda som blev rätt vara alltså de två etiketterna för en-ca och en-gb.

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Nja. Även om jag inte hade slagit ihop dem hade det ursprungliga objektet haft kvar alla sina etiketter och beskrivningar, så på det sättet är det värt att gå till botten med botens användare.

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Jag har nu manuellt tagit bort alla beskrivningar som jag förstod att de angav att det var en grensida.

Ainali (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Why add en label to >100 languages?"
LA2 (talkcontribs)

Jag provade ett nytt verktyg https://ordia.toolforge.org/text-to-lexemes

och lade med dess hjälp till några svenska ord. Det är lite underligt att man inte blir tillfrågad om någon betydelse, utan bara lägger till substantiv och verb med böjningsformer. För en del ord ändrade jag befintliga poster, som verbet hindra ([[Lexeme:L48009]]), men en del gammalt skräp verkar ligga kvar (som presensformen hindrar, utan angivelse av att det är en presensform). Kanske någon städar upp detta i framtiden, vad vet jag.

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Ajdå. Men det verkar inte som att du redigerade med Ordia, det lät väl dig bara upptäcka orden? Från din redigering ser det ut som att du använde lexeme-forms. Och när du redigerar i befintliga lexem i det så ska du dra de befintliga formerna till rätt ställe från det gula fältet, annars skapar du dubbletter i onödan. Verktyget är väldigt otydligt med denna dra-och-släpp-funktion, men det finns alltså inbyggt så att du slipper skapa dubblettformer och behovet av städning kan alltså undvikas om du använder det på rätt sätt.

LA2 (talkcontribs)

Aha! Dessutom behövs mallar för proper nouns (Göteborg, USA m.fl.), adverb och andra ordklasser.

Ainali (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Ordia"

Thanks for sharing your Sparql request

2
PAC2 (talkcontribs)

Hello

Two weeks you have shared a SPARQL request showing how to call the Wikipedia API in a SPARQL query (Wikidata:Status updates/2021 02 15).

Thanks to you, I've discovered this feature and it has helped me do develop a new tool which counts the number of links in an article by gender and develop a small tool in French w:fr:Modèle:Indice de diversité de genre.

SPARQL is such a powerful tool. PAC2 (talk) 07:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Wow! That's a pretty cool way of using it. Thanks for sharing!

Reply to "Thanks for sharing your Sparql request"
TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

Hey, Jan,


Here I am, pinging you, as promised. I'd love to join one of yours live editing Wikidata sessions.

We can think about some interesting topic.

I am really open to any topic, but it would be cool if it were somehow pandemic-related ː)

I saw you do this on Friday evenings (or at least the last one was on a Friday). Friday is kind of a busy day around here, but I am available anytime from 17ː30 to 00ː00 in Netherlands time.


Anyways, I hope this worksǃ


Best,

Tiago

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Hello Tiago! Thanks for pinging! I would love to do a stream that is pandemic-related. So far we have done two types of streams, one where we just edit for around 30 minutes and talk about it, and one that is an editing relay of sorts. We could do any style of these, or something else if you have any ideas. For the relay, we should be six persons in total. Since you are the guest, you get the honour to pick the topic and format, me and Abbe98 would just be happy to have you on.

Abbe98 (talkcontribs)

Hello Tiago, most often we do our live edits of Saturdays or Sundays, but both Fridays and Mondays have happened as well. Cheers!

TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

Thanksǃ Sunday and saturday would work even better here.

I am really fine with anything COVID-19 related, really. This dojo/relay of sorts format looks cool, but the just editing looks more straightforward.

I would go for the straightforward, I guess, at least this time ː)

Cheersǃ


Ainali (talkcontribs)

Let's do it the straightforward way @TiagoLubiana. Just think of a topic you want to to show off editing for about 20-30 minutes. Friday was an exception, we usually do Saturdays at 19.00 UTC. How's this Saturday, and if that's to close, how's the one coming after that? (The same question to you @Abbe98 :) )

Abbe98 (talkcontribs)

This Saturday works for me!

TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

This Saturday, 19 UTC, ok, that worksǃ I will think about a topic.

What should I do now? Any things that I need to know?

See you tomorrow, then ː)

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Could you send me a wikimail so that I get your email? I'll send you a link that you connect to. We use the service streamyard.com so all you need is a web browser (seems to work best with Chrome). Then we'll meet there online about ten minutes before we go live. I'll create the event later tonight and post some links here in case you want to share them.

Ainali (talkcontribs)
Ainali (talkcontribs)
TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

Oh, no problemsǃ We can do it next Saturday. Thank you for organizing it anyways..

Ainali (talkcontribs)
Abbe98 (talkcontribs)

Sorry, waited until last minute as I have gotten better but I'm afraid I will need to cancel tonight as well.

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Ok, let's just go ahead with two of us then!

TiagoLubiana (talkcontribs)

Oh, okay, let's go ahead, thenǃ I have been looking into COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates on Wikidata, maybe that can be the topic?

There is a template on enwiki, and I have some more data sources that could be used ː https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:COVID-19_vaccine_candidates. Would that be an okay topic?

Hope you get fully better, Abbe98ǃ

Ainali (talkcontribs)

That seems like a very interesting topic indeed!

Winner of Wikidata:Menu Challenge/Wikimania 2019

1
Millars (talkcontribs)

Hello. Thanks a lot. It was very exciting and I enjoy it a lot. I'm attending Wikimania. I reached you via Telegram. You can contact me there to meet. I notice that actually, the code no was not used and the 185 points from that language should not count, I imagine. I was not done with bad faith or intention. Regards. Millars (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the FindingGLAMs Challenge!

1
Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talkcontribs)
Thank you for participating in the FindingGLAMs Challenge!
By improving information about GLAM institutions on Wikidata, you made the Wikimedia projects better for everyone!
Lokal Profil (talkcontribs)

Snygg användning av det allmänna myndighetsregistret.


Det verkar dock som att mailto prefixet har smugit sig in i vissa av e-postfälten vilket jag inte tror är rätt.

Ainali (talkcontribs)

Jag hoppas att det finns på alla för jag la energi på att få in det. Engelska beskrivningen på e-mail address (P968) är "e-mail address of the organisation. Format: prefixed with mailto:".

Lokal Profil (talkcontribs)

Ah ser man på. Udda. Hade förväntat mig att det tvärt om var något som las på i gränssnittet snarare än att det är del av datat. Men se där lär man sig =)

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

There are no older topics