User talk:Jianhui67/Archive December 2014
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey!
Hey there Jianhui! A big thanks, this time personally, for your support recently, and also for the useful link on my talk page. I started off with a few this afternoon (I had no idea there were so many)! Actually, I was wondering if you could understand what is written on the talk page of Tanghulu (Q2476688)? If it has nothing to do with the item, would it be best to delete? And whilst on that topic, would you agree that Q18654692 is spam/promotional, or, at the very least, not notable? Or is there scope for improvement? Hope you're having a nice weekend... Jared Preston (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jared! I deleted the talk page of Tanghulu (Q2476688) as it has nothing to do with the item. It would be best to delete them. For Q18654692, I deleted it as the content looks promotional to me. I hope you are having a good weekend as well. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for redirects... :)
Hi, I'm working on emptying completely P107 for human beings, and I redirect all empty items I can, but as I cannot decipher chinese, corean, japanese, etc., I had asked for deletion.
Thank you for improving it by redirection :)
There is a small pack of Chinese, Corean items I could not decide whether they were in fact (or not) P31:Q5 - if you could add it when appropriate, that would be very nice of you.
Thank you very much, and I wish you happy holidays, (if these 2 next weeks are, for you). Thanks again, :) --Hsarrazin (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
To merge or not to merge?
Heya! I came across toy library (Q9404190), so looked at google translate and changed the English label accordingly, but am wondering, could the item actually be merged with toy library (Q1143018)? Before I take any action, I thought I'd better ask you! :) Jared Preston (talk) 13:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- I think it should be okay to merge as the content is almost the same. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:28, 31 December 2014 (UTC)