I refer to the revision you made on 18 April to two properties under the statement "adjacent station" for the item Kokubunji Station. You changed the rank of the two adjacent stations Nishi-Kokubunji Station and Musashi-Koganei Station from preferred rank to normal rank.
I would like to explain why they should be "preferred" rather than "normal" rank.
In Kokubunji Station the Seibu Kokubunji Line and the Seibu Tamako Line's adjacent stations had entries which contained old information. Therefore the newest adjacent stations were given a preferred rank and old adjacent stations were given a normal rank. I saw that you did not revert Koigakubo and Hitotsubashi-gakuen station, which says that you probably understand this action.
To a computer program reading the item, it would not be able to see that the preferred rank applies only to the Seibu lines, and I am therefore worried it might see the properties Nishi-Kokubunji and Musashi-Koganei as old entries. That is why I also moved them up to preferred rank.
I hope you can reconsider and allow me to change the rank back to preferred.
Thank you.
4月18日「国分寺駅」の中の「隣の駅」に、「西国分寺駅」・「武蔵小金井駅」その二つプロパティのランクが「推奨ランク」から「標準ランク」に修正するのついてです。
「国分寺駅」に、西武国分寺線と西武多摩湖線の「隣の駅」は過去のエントリーがあります。その為に、過去のエントリーが「標準ランク」を、最新版の「恋ヶ窪駅」・「一橋学園駅」が 「推奨ランク」を採録しました。
確かに、中央線の「西国分寺」と「武蔵小金井駅」ではその分別の必要がないですが、データベースクエリーの視点から、「鷹の台」「一橋大学」その過去のデータを合わせれば、どちらが最新のデータか、どちらが過去のデータが判りづらくなると思います。その故に中央線のも「推奨ランク」を採録しました。
その修正が再考してください。
ありがとうございます。
--Wanderer28 (talk) 18:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
