Topic on User talk:Loominade

Hi,

You put plurale tantum (Q138246) as the lexical category of negh/ (L643988) but it is wrong as plurale tantum is not lexical category. I suspect this is a noun. Could you take a look and correct it?

hi,

according to negh | Definition of {negh} at Klingon Language Wiki this word is:

This is an inherently plural form.

maybe plurale tantum (Q138246) should be instance of (P31)?

It seems that there is no clear consensus between has quality (P1552) and instance of (P31), see https://w.wiki/5Vqa I'll let you choose, both seems ok.

But what is clear is that Q138246 should not be be in lexical category ;)

thanks for reaching out