Hi Toni,
I saw you reverted an edit by Pamputt on defining formula (P2534) and it looks like there was a corresponding edit on calculated from (P4934). I think it was also incorrect but am not sure. Can you check it?
Thanks,
~~~~
Topic on User talk:Toni 001/Structured Discussions Archive 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hello. Yes, those are correct. Assume the added constraint was valid, then a formula using variables a, b and c would list all three as in defining formula (P7235) qualifier values, and then three more symbol represents (P9758) qualifiers to items Qa, Qb and Qc. But then it would not be clear which symbol corresponds to which variable. Therefore - consistent with the proposal - "symbol represents" is a qualifier to "in defining formula", which then needs to be a main value. (There is no such concept as a qualifier on a qualifier.)