Topic on User talk:AttoRenato

What does this mean in clear, simple language? Grazie, ~~~~

@Edelseider Actually a picture - any picture - depicts an "object", not a "category" (i.e. that picture depicts a couple of buildings in Strasbourg, as example of "Art Nouveau architecture in Strasbourg", and not the architecture per-se). So is wise to remove it. Bye

Good, I can understand that. Why do you employ such a cryptic edit comment, then? Please be clearer next time. :)

The comment is not my own, but is by [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/distributed/# this tool], which I often use for speed reason. I agree that the comment may be more punctual. Bye

This comment is completely not understandable by any human being... Could you explain why this modification? In this case, image property is used by several infoboxes on several wikis, so you removed the image from the infobox...

The comment is not my own, but is by [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/distributed/# this tool], which I often use for speed reason. I agree that the comment is not so punctual, but Magnus Manske (the auctor of the tool) might be aware of this. I apologize for my (bad) edit, the point is that the item is also instance of Q14204246, and among property constraint of Image there is Q14204246. The tool helps (also) in resolving conflicts between properties and constraints, so... the (good) edit (in this way) is deleting instance of Q14204246, or resolving the conflict Bye. (AttoRenato not logged)