Talk:Q811930
Autodescription — construction business (Q811930)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “construction business” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- construction business (Q811930)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
construction business⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Item definition[edit]
According to the linked Wikipedia pages and linked external identifiers, this article should represent a construction company and not a single person acting as an entrepreneur in this business. That's why I made some changes.
Also the definition appears to be unclear for me: "building contractor" suggests that it's not only a construction company but also one which is responsible for a specific project (for which it had signed a "contract"). In contrast, there is the English term "building company" used as an alias which only generally stands for a construction company.
Many external links are using this item (Q811930) as a normal construction firm (without the necessity of having a contract).
There is also a couple of other items:
Both appear to be "contractors". --> So I would propose to move any contract-related statements to one of these items and use that one as a contractor. (Which one?)
@Joelkaula:: What's your opinion on this? --Zaccarias (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)