Talk:Q23140
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Warwickshire (Q23140)
description: ceremonial and non-metropolitan county in England, UK
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Warwickshire” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Warwickshire (query)
- Map of places in Warwickshire (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (Based on elevation above sea level (P2044).)
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (Based on height (P2048).)
- Organizations with headquarters in Warwickshire (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Warwickshire (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Warwickshire, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Warwickshire (query)
- People dead in Warwickshire, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Warwickshire, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Warwickshire, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Warwickshire (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Warwickshire (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Deprecate or remove?[edit]
Hi Dcflyer,
I'm not entirely sure what to think and do about the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) on this item. I see that you put it at the rank deprecated (which is better than just leave is in normal rank) but why not just remove it? AFAIK, the error doesn't come from the source (the BnF) but from the bot ; in the first case, I would have kept the statement as deprecated but in the second case, I would just remove it. What do you think?
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)