Talk:Q20477577

Classification of the class classification of languages (Q20477577)   

For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.

Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)

• classification of languages (Q20477577)
  • specialised classification scheme (Q24249534)
    • classification scheme (Q5962346)
      • knowledge organization system (Q6423319)
        • conceptual system (Q3622126)
          • system (Q58778)
            • collective entity (Q99527517)
              • entity (Q35120) ⊸
          • abstract entity (Q7048977) ^(#)→
          • artificial object (Q16686448) ^(%)→
          • concept (Q151885)
            • abstract entity (Q7048977) ^(#)→
            • semantic unit (Q15916540)
              • constituent (Q1786828)
                • emic unit (Q5371079)
                  • linguistic unit (Q11953984)
                    • unit (Q2198779) ^…
      • scheme (Q12775893)
        • model (Q1979154)
          • ^→(%) artificial object (Q16686448)
            • object (Q488383)
              • entity (Q35120) ⊸
          • information (Q11028)
            • ^→(#) abstract entity (Q7048977)
              • entity (Q35120) ⊸

Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)

⟨classification of languages⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)

Generic queries for classes

• Number of subclasses (query)
• List of subclasses
• List of direct subclasses
• Number of instances (query)
• Count of instances by class (query)
• List of instances (query)
• List of most frequent properties for items of this class (query)
• Properties suggested for this class (query)

Part of genetic classification

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q20477577&oldid=prev&diff=654928569 @Infovarius: It does not seem that the two are part of each others, it seems that genetic classification is a specific kind of language classification ( genetic classification is a language specification ). I can’t read the articles about genetic classification but if they are about the classifying process, the classification oabject (the calsses and the links between them) is the output, not a part. I’ll revert you revert unless you have more infornations. author  TomT0m / talk page 09:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I can't insist as I can not firmly decide what linguistic taxonomy (Q1972954) is about, but it seems to me that it is primary a branch of linguistics. --Infovarius (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)