Property talk:P6251
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Documentation
- Start a query
- Current uses
- Statistics by class
- String length
- Language of strings
- List of qualifiers
- Count
catchphrase
commonly used phrase by which someone or something may be recognized
commonly used phrase by which someone or something may be recognized
Represents | catchphrase (Q2708515), winged words (Q1935136) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type | Monolingual text | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | .{2,}| | ||||||||||||
Example | Steve Urkel (Q2777701) → Did I do that? Homer Simpson (Q7810) → D'oh! Emeril Lagasse (Q339838) → Bam! Steve Martin (Q16473) → Well excuse me | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P6251 (Q98130709) | ||||||||||||
See also | motto text (P1451), last words (P3909) | ||||||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
|
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6251#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6251#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P6251#Scope, SPARQL
Translated versions[edit]
Notified participants of WikiProject Narration
for instance in the german translation, Homer Simpson (Q7810) → catchphrase (P6251) → Nein!
(not a literal translation (P2441)). I think that statement would be less correct then the current statement. ergo: the current statement should be preferred if we model it like this. How about a qualifier along the lines of official translation? --Loominade (talk) 11:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Loominade, if one would want to add translations I agree with your proposal to set the rank of the phrase in its original language to preferred. One could use language of work or name (P407) to indicate the language (e.g. German) of the translation. I'm not sure if it is necessary to state that it is an official translation - I would rather expect that it is. -Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)