Property talk:P1028

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

donated by
person or organization who donated the object
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “physical object (Q223557), award (Q618779), collection (Q2668072): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “physical object (Q223557), award (Q618779), collection (Q2668072)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#Type Q223557, Q618779, Q2668072, SPARQL
Value type “human (Q5), organization (Q43229), group of humans (Q16334295): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5), organization (Q43229), group of humans (Q16334295) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#Value type Q5, Q43229, Q16334295, SPARQL
Required qualifier “point in time (P585): this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
Property “instance of (P31)” declared by target items of “donated by (P1028): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “instance of (P31)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#Target required claim P31, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1028#Scope, SPARQL

Object/subject in descriptions[edit]

@Laddo, Micru: In the descriptions I think it should read "subject", not "object" or omit both not to cause confusion!? --Marsupium (talk) 10:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marsupium: Using "this item" could be more general. You have some examples where "object" does not fit? -- LaddΩ chat ;) 01:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single value is wrong[edit]

I've stumbled upon this "condition" in examples of literary/musical/cultural awards. By far the most of them in Germany have two or more donors. So I'm completely opposed to this wikidata fixation on "Single value". It obviously doesn't represent real life conditions /reality. Please let us cancel this fixation. -- Justus Nussbaum (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this recommendation. It makes no sense for anything which can be donated by more than one entity. For example, archival and museum collections may have multiple donors. One person may donate a selection of their papers during their lifetime and their child may donate remaining papers after their death. All these papers end up in the same collection with two donation statements at two points in time, e.g. 1997 and 2015. But even in simple cases, it doesn't really make sense. A friend and I pooled our money to donate a baby gift. Therefore it has two donors. We're not a single corporate entity, just friends. That happens all the time. As said above, this constraint doesn't reflect reality. Ruthbrarian (talk) 15:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This property makes no sense without more data[edit]

I don't understand how this property works as a main statement on an item? Surely it should be a qualifier to an owned by (P127) statement otherwise it's kind of meaningless? --SilentSpike (talk) 15:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]