Wikidata:Property proposal/usage label

usage context of form or sense

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes

   Not done

Description	list of sets of context label property (Q116547761) (language style (P6191), field of usage (P9488), has characteristic (P1552), variety of lexeme, form or sense (P7481), location of sense usage (P6084)). Other individual context label property (Q116547761) statement will be treated as and with this statement.
Data type	Item
Domain	form, sense
Allowed values	list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486)
Example 1	summer (L3332-S2) → (1) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier language style (P6191)=poetic language (Q116547730) (2) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier language style (P6191)=archaism (Q181970)
Example 2	monitor (L7068-S2) → (1) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier location of sense usage (P6084)=Hong Kong (Q8646) (2) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier location of sense usage (P6084)=United Kingdom (Q145), language style (P6191)=archaism (Q181970)
Example 3	buggery (L1010889-S1) → (1) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier language style (P6191)=word taboo (Q4449313) (2) list of values as qualifiers (Q23766486); qualifier field of usage (P9488)=law (Q7748) (Note: location of sense usage (P6084) applies to entire sense so will be a separate statement)
Single-value constraint	no, instead we should have multivalue constraint

Currently when more than one type of context label property (Q116547761) is used, they are usually considered as having and relation. When more than one value is used in same property, the relationship is usually and other than variety of lexeme, form or sense (P7481), location of sense usage (P6084) and field of usage (P9488) which can only be or. This property will allow users to specify more complex context labels, such as a term that is obsolete in some places but common in another place. GZWDer (talk) 05:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Question How about
  monitor (L7068-S2)location of sense usage (P6084)Hong Kong (Q8646)
  monitor (L7068-S2)location of sense usage (P6084)United Kingdom (Q145)
  monitor (L7068-S2)language style (P6191)archaism (Q181970)valid in place (P3005)United Kingdom (Q145)
  ? Not that this would equally apply to example 1, but there the property in question is the same in both statements, so perhaps an OR relation would typically be inferred from that fact anyhow?―BlaueBlüte (talk) 06:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
• For example: OALD labeled buggery (L1010889) as "British English, taboo or law". This can not be modeled if we only assume an and relation.--GZWDer (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment @GZWDer: Based on your above comment it seems important to note that the term “label” in this proposal apparently isn’t (always?) used in the typical Wikidata sense “label of an item”, but in a dictionary-specific sense that the English Wiktionary calls “context label”. I think it might be helpful to amended the proposal to clarify what exactly each occurrence of “label” means. ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
• Renamed to "usage context of form or sense".--GZWDer (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
• See also Wikidata:Lexicographical data/Usage context for proposed modelling.--GZWDer (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Not done - not created per lack of support. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)