Wikidata:Property proposal/Project Drawdown solution ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Project Drawdown solution ID[edit]
Not done
| Description | Target represents a solution listed by Project Drawdown as an important researched method for drawing down CO2 in tackling climate change. |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | item |
| Allowed values | [A-Z/]+ |
| Example 1 | tropical forest (Q1048194) → Tropical forests |
| Example 2 | female education (Q15675634) → Educating girls |
| Example 3 | onshore wind farm (Q50687555) → Wind turbines (onshore) |
| Source | [https://www.drawdown.org/solutions-summary-by-rank |
| Planned use | Classifying all items that have a related topic in Project Drawdown. |
| Number of IDs in source | 100 |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.drawdown.org/solutions/$1 |
Motivation[edit]
To give greater visibility to Project Drawdown and to these solutions. To enable searching and discovery of instances of these types of projects around the world. Pauljmackay (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support David (talk) 07:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think the example items match well with existing Wikidata entries. For example the tropical forest (Q1048194) is an item about the tropical forest and not an item about how restoration of the tropical forest could save CO2. If there was an item called "restoration of the tropical forest" I think it would better apply. This is a problem with all of the articles on Drawdown, as they don't describe the items they have in the title, but describe how a specific item could be used to combat climate change. And maybe it would suffice to use described at URL (P973) in this case. --Kristbaum (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Pauljmackay: Would it be okay for you if we closed this proposal as
Not done? (Also: Thank you for creating this proposal, I appreciate your work, even if it maybe wont become a property) --Kristbaum (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kristbaum: I appreciate and understand your feedback on this. In biomass (Q18537) I've tried to use described by source (P1343) to link to the page on Project Drawdown and then add a reference URL qualifier. Does that seem a bit more structured way to create a reference? Thanks. Pauljmackay (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Pauljmackay: Would it be okay for you if we closed this proposal as
Not done Closed as no activity and no consensus has been reached. --Kristbaum (talk) 00:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)