User talk:Thibdx/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikidata, Thibdx!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards!
Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC).
NFPA 704 in polycarbonates[edit]
Hi. I reverted you edits in polycarbonate (Q62246) concerning NFPA Fire (P994); this is not the right way to add NFPA data (and it was a violation of a constraint marked as mandatory constraint (Q21502408)). Check how it is added in e.g. Q153#P4952. Also, there is a citation needed constraint (Q54554025) in safety classification and labelling (P4952), so every NFPA 704 data needs a source. If you have any problem with this, feel free to ask me. Regards, Wostr (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for informing me. We want to use polycarbonate as a test item for the new material infobox on the french wikipedia so I just added the values that were in the infobox. Sources were missing. I corrected the format and added one. Regards. --Thibdx (talk) 11:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. One more thing: there is no NFPA 704 in this source ;) only HMIS (we don't have HMIS in WD yet, only GHS and NFPA 704 right now; I think the next thing we will be adding to WD is ADR and then maybe HMIS). Wostr (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- ^_^' I was only familiar with GHS. It's the one I generally see on the products we use in France. This made me learn some things about HMIS and NFPA. I see that these 2 systems have some differences. [1] [2] The statment has been updated. --Thibdx (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update :) Fortunately, most of local classification and labelling systems of hazardous materials are being replaced by GHS (or rather by local implementations of GHS... with many differences between countries; but at least it's the same system ;). Wostr (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- ^_^' I was only familiar with GHS. It's the one I generally see on the products we use in France. This made me learn some things about HMIS and NFPA. I see that these 2 systems have some differences. [1] [2] The statment has been updated. --Thibdx (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. One more thing: there is no NFPA 704 in this source ;) only HMIS (we don't have HMIS in WD yet, only GHS and NFPA 704 right now; I think the next thing we will be adding to WD is ADR and then maybe HMIS). Wostr (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)