User talk:Gtsulab
Welcome to Wikidata, Gtsulab!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Cell line ontology[edit]
Cell Line Ontology ID (P2158) is ready. --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
P2293[edit]
genetic association (P2293) is ready to be used. --Tobias1984 (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
New page for catalogues[edit]
Hi, I created a new page for collecting sites that could be added to Mix'n'match and I plan to expand it with the ones that already have scrapers by category. Feel free to expand, use for property creation. Best, Adam Harangozó (talk) 11:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
'added CA prop 65 relation info'[edit]
I don't think that should be 'instance of' relation. This should be subject has role (P2868) relation as it is not 'a Xxx', but it has certain effect under certain conditions. What's more, chemical substances items shouldn't be filled with hundreds of such relations ('is a solvent', 'is a toxin', 'is a food additive' etc.) that has better, more precise properties available (subject has role (P2868), has use (P366)). Last but not least, even if database X uses 'instance of' relation for something does not mean it is the best way to handle it in WD as database X is probably very limited in scope and WD isn't. Regards, Wostr (talk) 20:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)