Hello, Can you please use Q11569986 rather than Q329439 when you find "rytiny" on Czech authorities? First one refers to printmakers artists ; second one to craftsmen. Example with Alix (see history of Q3573440: the information is duplicated, as the source is already used for Q11569986 occupation). It is a lot of work to correct these assertions. Thank you!
Topic on User talk:Frettie
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Reply to "Q11569986 rather than Q329439"
I think, that is correct setup, Q3573440 (Alix) has in NKČR "rytci" (engraver – Q329439). @Vojtěch Dostál – what do you think?
Hello, no, as I said, Q329439 refers to craftmen who worked metal to do some decoration on metal or medals. And Q11569986 refers to artists (printmakers) who work metal plates to produce art prints. 99% of Q329439 uses after the Czech authority notice are wrong...
Oh, i see! Thanks! I moved "tiskař" from Q329439 to Q11569986.
Did you move all usages? I can do that
I didn't.
I will do it when I have some time.
Thank you very much, both of you :)
@Daehan There's 14 statements where the claim is supported by another reference. What should be done about these? Also moved?
Hello @Vojtěch Dostál, I checked them, and they are all printmakers, yes.
An additional request, maybe. When you get a source (P854) from https://cs.isabart.org, shouldn't P248 be Q107456632 instead of Q10855166 ? (Example here: Q6149252)
Just to be clear, regarding the 14 statements, there should not be Q329439 as an occupation: they all are Q11569986 and the sources used for the first should actually be added to the second. Thanks!
OK, I will fix all statements.
As for Abart, I can't help unfortunately. Tools available to me cannot edit references so easily. But I agree.
OK, thank you for everything, @Vojtěch Dostál !