Talk:Q975413
Autodescription — encyclopedic dictionary (Q975413)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “encyclopedic dictionary” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- encyclopedic dictionary (Q975413)
- dictionary (Q23622)
- encyclopedia (Q5292)
- lexicon (Q18168594)
- →(@) knowledge organization system (Q6423319)
- serial (Q2217301)
- series of creative works (Q7725310)
- recurring entity (Q28314507)
- →(#+) publication (Q732577)
- →(⁂) text (Q234460)
- →(⋔) reference work (Q13136)
- →(℧) tertiary source (Q1063801)
- encyclopedic dictionary (Q975413)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
encyclopedic dictionary⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Allbuch
[edit]I am an editor on the german Wikipedia. We have there a lemma which ist called Allbuch. This lemma deals about a certain thing, which claims to be a little bit similar to an encyclopedia. But it is not one. The lemma is presumably a not existing word. The lemmma is linked with interwikilinks to encyclopedia in other wikis. This lemma is strongly criticised on the discussionspage on the german wikipedia. The summary was, to delete the false interwikilinks . Why do you, Starry Grandma, revert myedits on encycylopedic dictionaries. Do you know any word about the german „allbuch”, from which the links a coming? Please inform yourself before editing. Informations on the german Wikipedia, Discussionspage of Lemma „Allbuch.” Thanks Orik (talk) 19:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- I just mention that we have standalone item for "Allbuch": Q2648129--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)