Talk:Q2043199
Autodescription — district of Belarus (Q2043199)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “district of Belarus” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- district of Belarus (Q2043199)
- administrative territorial entity of Belarus (Q14921981)
- second-level administrative division (Q13220204)
- raion (Q7688)
- political territorial entity (Q1048835)
- district of Belarus (Q2043199)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
district of Belarus⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
@Infovarius:, I think that for each administrative subdivision classes/types (first level for countries/states), defined by the local country/state Government institutions, that correspods to parts of ISO 3166-2 as definition for country/state admin. subdivision entities we should use property instance of (P31) as to Define Domain for instanses or subclaseses for it's local Domain instanses for each country/state.--Avatar6 (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Avatar6: I suppose that Liepieĺ District (Q268331) is a second-level administrative division (Q13220204) that's why subclass relation is good. --Infovarius (talk) 10:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
What is district of Belarus (Q2043199)?[edit]
Now district of Belarus (Q2043199) is second-level administrative division (Q13220204) is ... physical object (Q223557). physical object (Q223557) has characteristic (P1552): mass (Q11423), height (Q208826), etc. So, what, eg, mass (Q11423), height (Q208826) of district of Belarus (Q2043199)? --Fractaler (talk) 11:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- ??? None of your utterings makes any sense at all. What do you want? Sänger (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, of all the terms that you used, only for 1 you somehow gave a definition ("the real world is that, what you see, once you get up from your chair in front of a monitor and open your eyes"). It is very very sense. Especially for the blind or for those who can not get up from chair in front of a monitor.
- What I want is very easy to determine, just read the sentence before the "?" --Fractaler (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is no sentence, that makes any sense at all, just some items/properties/whatever you wrote here, that have no connection with this item here whatsoever. Sänger (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)