Talk:Q16012028
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — legal scholar (Q16012028)
description: researcher who focuses on legal issues
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “legal scholar” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
legal scholar⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- Generic queries for position
This section is generated using {{Generic queries for positions}}
- List of people holding the position, sorted by starting date (query)
- List of people and their ID's on other systems (query)
- Number of people having hold this position by gender (query) – List of people having hold this position with gender (query)
- Number of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query) – List of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query)
- People having hold the function by length of term (query)
- List of people having hold the position by total duration in the position (query)
- List of people having hold the position by gender at the starting date (query)
- List of people holding the function with employer as qualifier (query)
- List of people having hold the position as qualifier of employer (P108) (query)
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Bonsoir, ce renommage pose problème. Déjà, l’appellation "scientifique du droit" est assez inédite ... et au minimum pas du tout usuel ... Ensuite, l'item était employé dans la majorité des pages wikidata pour l'appellation "jurisconsulte". Toutes ces pages (la quasi totalité des pages pour lequel jurisconsulte était le bon) se retrouve avec un "scientifique du droit" tout à fait impropre ... Il y avait un doublon avec Q2664701 à résoudre, effectivement, mais on se retrouve avec pire qu'avant à présent ...--Benj73 (talk) 19:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)