Talk:Q1456371
Autodescription — Lychnidos (Q1456371)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Lychnidos” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Lychnidos (query)
- Map of places in Lychnidos (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (Based on elevation above sea level (P2044).)
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (Based on height (P2048).)
- Organizations with headquarters in Lychnidos (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Lychnidos (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Lychnidos, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Lychnidos (query)
- People dead in Lychnidos, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Lychnidos, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Lychnidos, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Lychnidos (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Lychnidos (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
@StanProg: This is an ancient city at the place of present-day Ohrid. What is the point to add the Ottoman Empire, Yugoslavia and so on if Lychnidus ceased to exist in the 6th century? Pasztilla (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Pasztilla: Good catch. I did a mass edit of the vilalges, towns and cities and I've missed to exclude this one. When I look at the data, maybe it should not be defined as "town", but just as "archaeological site". Maybe there's even better way to define it. My concern is that other mass edits may also set values that are not related to it. What do you think? --StanProg (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
@StanProg: I think you are right, we better switch from town to ancient city (Q15661340), and I'm thinking in these case dissolved, abolished or demolished date (P576) should also be defined to avoid chronological anomalies. I am not very pro in mass querying and mass editing, but did it for this entity. Pasztilla (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Pasztilla: ancient city (Q15661340) is a perfect solution. I'm not sure that dissolved, abolished or demolished date (P576) is related to settlements, but it's easy to be "detected" and changed in future if needed. Good job, thank you. --StanProg (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Pasztilla: Also we need a way to define that it's currently in North Macedonia, as archeological object. --StanProg (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, you're absolutely right. Pasztilla (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)