Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: cryoablation with 6-mm-tip catheters is still less effective than radiofrequency ablation. (Q51581150)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article published on 2 December 2009
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: cryoablation with 6-mm-tip catheters is still less effective than radiofrequency ablation. |
scientific article published on 2 December 2009 |
Statements
1 reference
Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: cryoablation with 6-mm-tip catheters is still less effective than radiofrequency ablation. (English)
1 reference
Aaisha Opel
1 reference
Sam Murray
1 reference
Nikhil Kamath
1 reference
Mehul Dhinoja
1 reference
Dominic Abrams
1 reference
Simon Sporton
1 reference
Richard Schilling
1 reference
Mark Earley
1 reference
2 December 2009
1 reference
1 reference
7
1 reference
3
1 reference
340-343
1 reference
Identifiers
1 reference