Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. (Q50895389)

24 March 2018

title

Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. (English)

1 reference

24 March 2018

1 reference

1 reference

5

1 reference

24 March 2018

Robert S Sandler

3

object named as

Robert S Sandler

1 reference

24 March 2018

author name string

Daniel E Jonas

1

1 reference

24 March 2018

Louise B Russell

2

1 reference

24 March 2018

Jon Chou

4

1 reference

24 March 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

29 June 2007

1 reference

24 March 2018

The American Journal of Gastroenterology

published in

1 reference

24 March 2018

volume

102

1 reference

24 March 2018

issue

11

1 reference

24 March 2018

page(s)

2401-2410

1 reference

24 March 2018

Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Screening of colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Parental emotional and time costs predict compliance with respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Travel distance as time price and the demand for mental health services.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Barriers to prenatal care among low-income women in New York City

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Cost implications of routine mammography screening of women 50-69 years in the county of Funen, Denmark.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Cost-effectiveness of the clinical practice recommendations in the AHCPR guideline for smoking cessation. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Estimating time and travel costs incurred in clinic based screening: flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Estimating the client costs of addiction treatment: first findings from the client drug abuse treatment cost analysis program (Client DATCAP).

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Costs incurred by patients undergoing advanced colorectal cancer therapy. A comparison of raltitrexed and fluorouracil plus folinic acid

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

10.1111/J.1572-0241.2007.01387.X

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

24 March 2018

PubMed ID

17608779

1 reference

24 March 2018