Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. (Q50668343)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
journal article published in 2011
- Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. |
journal article published in 2011 |
|
Statements
2 references
8 December 2019
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. (English)
1 reference
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding (English)
1 reference
8 December 2019
1 reference
8 December 2019
Donald L Patrick
Patrick DL
2 references
8 December 2019
Laurie B Burke
1 reference
Chad J Gwaltney
1 reference
Nancy Kline Leidy
1 reference
Mona L Martin
1 reference
Elizabeth Molsen
1 reference
Lena Ring
1 reference
10 October 2011
1 reference
14
1 reference
8
1 reference
978-988
1 reference
University of Washington
1 reference
2 February 2024
Identifiers
2 references
8 December 2019
1 reference