Continuous ultra-low-intensity artificial daylight is not as effective as red LED light in photodynamic therapy of multiple actinic keratoses. (Q50522584)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article published in December 2011
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Continuous ultra-low-intensity artificial daylight is not as effective as red LED light in photodynamic therapy of multiple actinic keratoses. |
scientific article published in December 2011 |
Statements
1 reference
Continuous ultra-low-intensity artificial daylight is not as effective as red LED light in photodynamic therapy of multiple actinic keratoses. (English)
1 reference
Stine Regin Wiegell
1 reference
Jakob Heydenreich
1 reference
Susanne Fabricius
1 reference
Hans Christian Wulf
1 reference
1 December 2011
1 reference
27
1 reference
6
1 reference
280-285
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
Identifiers
1 reference