Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement. (Q47733409)

5 February 2018

title

Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement. (English)

1 reference

5 February 2018

1 reference

J L Cahill

1

1 reference

5 February 2018

B Shadbolt

series ordinal

2

1 reference

5 February 2018

J M Scarvell

series ordinal

3

1 reference

5 February 2018

P N Smith

series ordinal

4

1 reference

5 February 2018

publication date

1 April 2008

1 reference

5 February 2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

published in

1 reference

5 February 2018

volume

16

1 reference

5 February 2018

page(s)

58-65

1 reference

5 February 2018

issue

1

1 reference

5 February 2018

Health outcome after total knee replacement in the very elderly.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Do QOL instruments agree? A comparison of the 15D (Health-Related Quality of Life) and NHP (Nottingham Health Profile) in hip and knee replacements.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Brief comprehensive quality of life assessment after stroke: the assessment of quality of life instrument in the north East melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS).

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Cost utility analysis: what should be measured?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Hip function in patients >55 years old: population reference values

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

The often poor clinical outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Some correlates of self-rated health for Australian women.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Assessing health-related quality of life following myocardial infarction: is the SF-12 useful?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

The utility of health states after stroke: a systematic review of the literature

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F230949900801600115

10.1177/230949900801600115

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

5 February 2018

PubMed ID

18453662

1 reference

5 February 2018