Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (Q38263435)

1 September 2017

0 references

1 reference

title

Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (English)

1 reference

1 September 2017

1 reference

2

1 reference

1 September 2017

Vanja Pupovac

1

0 references

publication date

29 October 2014

1 reference

Science and Engineering Ethics

1 September 2017

1 reference

1 September 2017

21

1 reference

1 September 2017

5

1 reference

1 September 2017

1331-1352

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6

1 September 2017

0 references

cites work

The problem of plagiarism

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Plagiarism detection--quality management tool for all scientific journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Prevalence of plagiarism in recent submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Survey of ethical issues in dental research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Plagiarism: words and ideas

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Observations of ethical misconduct among industrial hygienists in England.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Déjà vu--a study of duplicate citations in Medline

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

The perils of copy and paste: plagiarism in scientific publishing.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Scientists behaving badly

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Research integrity in China: problems and prospects

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Biochemia Medica has started using the CrossCheck plagiarism detection software powered by iThenticate

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Repairing research integrity

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Research Misconduct: A Pilot Study of British Addiction Researchers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-014-9600-6

Fraud will out--or will it?

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

1 reference

12 December 2020

Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data

1 reference

12 December 2020

Journals step up plagiarism policing

1 reference

12 December 2020

Research universities and scientific misconduct -- history, policies, and the future

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S11948-014-9600-6

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

1 September 2017

journals/see/PupovacF15

1 reference

DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02

28 January 2021

1 reference

PubMed ID

25352123